How do we prevent the fusion reactor chamber from melting?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods used to prevent the fusion reactor chamber from melting due to the high temperatures of the plasma. It explores concepts related to magnetic confinement, specifically in the context of tokamak and stellarator designs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the chamber can avoid melting when in contact with high-temperature plasma, suggesting the use of magnetic fields to maintain distance.
  • Another participant confirms that strong magnetic fields are the standard approach for plasma containment in tokamak reactors, mentioning ITER as a key project.
  • A participant challenges the claim that stellarators do not rely entirely on magnetic confinement, asserting that they also depend solely on magnetic fields.
  • Subsequent replies clarify that both tokamak and stellarator designs utilize magnetic fields, but differ in their generation methods, with tokamaks requiring a plasma current in addition to external coils.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the reliance of stellarators on magnetic confinement, with some participants asserting that they use a combination of methods while others clarify that they rely solely on magnetic fields.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specifics of containment methods and the distinctions between different reactor designs, indicating a need for further clarification on the operational principles of tokamaks and stellarators.

woonjy2013
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
this question might be a bit stupid, but if the plasma in the fusion reactor has very high temperature, then how do we make the chamber not melt? i mean, not to join? contact? each other(chamber wall and plasma).
do we use magnetic field to make the distance? then how do we do that?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Last edited:
rootone said:
There is at least one other approach which is not entirely reliant on magnetic confinement, although that is still a part of the story.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendelstein_7-X

This statement is very misleading. It is true that there are alternatives to magnetic confinement.
However, stellarators like Wendelstein rely entirely of magnetic confinement.
 
thanks!
 
OK thanks for that correction, I had thought that the stellarator project used a combination of containment methods, with magnetism being one, but didn't have time to recheck on that.
 
Both tokamak and stellarator use magnetic fields only. Just the origin of the field is different: Tokamaks need a magnetic field component that has to come from a plasma current (together with the stronger fields from coils), stellarators work with magnetic fields from coils only.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
35
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K