The discussion revolves around the feasibility of compact fusion reactors as a power source for small cities, exploring the technical, theoretical, and practical aspects of nuclear fusion technology. Participants examine the claims made by Lockheed Martin regarding their compact fusion reactor concept and its potential to generate economic power, while also addressing the historical context and challenges associated with fusion energy development.
Participants generally express skepticism about the current state of compact fusion technology and its timeline for realization. Multiple competing views remain regarding the viability of Lockheed's approach and the characterization of alternative fusion methods, indicating that the discussion is unresolved.
Limitations include the lack of a working prototype, ongoing uncertainties about the technical feasibility of compact fusion reactors, and the historical context of fusion research that has not led to practical applications despite decades of effort.
Do you think publishing something means it's true and not publishing means it isn't? Consensus science doesn't prove one is on the right track.russ_watters said:Frankly, this sounds like meaningless corporate-speak to me. You cannot schedule discovery/invention and you cannot design the post-discovery commercial development process until you know what you are developing.
I disagree with every one of those statements.
No, but that is not what you said before.bob012345 said:Do you think publishing something means it's true and not publishing means it isn't?
No, it just makes it much more likely.Consensus science doesn't prove one is on the right track.