How Do You Apply Gauss's Law to a Non-Uniformly Charged Non-Conducting Cylinder?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Gauss's Law to a non-uniformly charged, non-conducting cylinder with a volume density that varies with the radial distance from the axis. The original poster presents a problem involving the calculation of the electric field at two different distances from the axis of the cylinder.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Gauss's Law for both parts of the problem, questioning the implications of the cylinder's radius on the Gaussian surface used for calculations. There is an exploration of the relationship between the charge distribution and the choice of Gaussian surface.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying the details of part b and discussing the relevance of the cylinder's radius in the context of Gauss's Law. Some guidance has been provided regarding the placement of the Gaussian surface, but no consensus has been reached on the implications of the original radius.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of clarity in the original problem statement regarding the specifics of part b, which has led to questions about the application of Gauss's Law in this scenario.

lcam2
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
A long, solid, non-conducting cylinder of radius 8 cm has a non-uniform volume density, ρ, that is a function of the radial distance r from the axis of the cylinder. ρ = A*r2 where A is a constant of value 3 μC/m5.

Homework Equations



Gauss's law EA = Q/(epsilon)
Q(enclosed)= Pv
Volume of cylinder = 2*(PI)*r*L

The Attempt at a Solution


Part a can be done using gauss's law, and integrating Q(enclosed)= pv; since the volume density is not constant.
The problem is part b, where the point where I have to calculate the field is outside the Gaussian surface.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
lcam2 said:
The problem is part b, where the point where I have to calculate the field is outside the Gaussian surface.
That's a puzzling statement, since you put the Gaussian surface wherever you need to in order to find the field. Please state the complete part b question.
 
Im sorry i didn't notice it was missing,

(a) What is the magnitude of the electric field 6 cm from the axis of the cylinder?

(b) What is the magnitude of the electric field 10 cm from the axis of the cylinder?
 
lcam2 said:
(b) What is the magnitude of the electric field 10 cm from the axis of the cylinder?
OK, so what's the problem in applying Gauss's law to solve this part, just like part a?

Hint: Your Gaussian surface will have a radius of 10 cm.
 
Last edited:
so, basically what you are saying is that the original radius of the cylinder does not matter, am I correct?
 
lcam2 said:
so, basically what you are saying is that the original radius of the cylinder does not matter, am I correct?
It matters in that it tells you the extent of the charge distribution. But it doesn't prevent you from having a Gaussian surface outside of the cylinder.
 
Ok, thank u!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K