How Do You Apply the Chain Rule in Multivariable Calculus Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richyw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying the chain rule in multivariable calculus, specifically in the context of computing partial derivatives for a function defined in terms of three variables. The original poster presents a problem involving the function (u,v) and seeks to compute the Jacobian matrix and specific partial derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the computation of the Jacobian and the relationship between the matrix of partial derivatives and the determinants of submatrices. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the determinants and the necessity of focusing on 2x2 matrices instead of the full 2x3 matrix.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion about the definitions and significance of the computations being performed. Some participants suggest that the original poster may understand how to compute the values but lacks clarity on their meaning. There is no explicit consensus on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the specific notation used for partial derivatives and the definitions involved, indicating a need for clarity on the mathematical concepts being discussed. The original poster references a textbook for further context, suggesting that the problem may be tied to specific theoretical material.

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let (u,v)=\mathbf{f}(x,y,x)=(2x+y^3,xe^{5y-7z})

Compute D\mathbf{f}(x,y,z),\;\partial (u,v)/\partial(x,y),\;\partial (u,v)/\partial(y,z)\text{ and }\partial (u,v)/\partial(x,z)

Homework Equations



-chain rule

The Attempt at a Solution



well I can get D\mathbf{f}(x,y,z)=\left[\begin{matrix} \partial u / \partial x & \partial u / \partial y & \partial u / \partial z \\ \partial v / \partial x & \partial v / \partial y & \partial v/ \partial z \end{matrix}\right]=\left[\begin{matrix} 2 & 3y^2 & 0 \\ e^{5y-7z} & 5xe^{5y-7z} & -7xe^{5y-7z}\end{matrix}\right]and I can see that if I ignore the variable that is not in the partial, and take the determinant of that 2x2 matrix, then I get the partial derivative I want. My questions is what am I doing? what happens if it is a 3x2 matrix instead of a 2x3? does this "method" still work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand the question. You seemed to have solved the problem. (The solution looks good to me). What determinant are you talking about?
 
richyw said:
if I ignore the variable that is not in the partial, and take the determinant of that 2x2 matrix, then I get the partial derivative I want.

I do not understand what you mean.
 
well I have the matrix derivative, but I still need to get those three partial derivatives. For example I can see that \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (x,y)}=\left|\begin{matrix} 2 & 3y^2 \\ e^{5y-7z} & 5xe^{5y-7z} \end{matrix}\right|=(10x-3y^2)e^{5y-7z}so I am taking the components of my matrix derivative that are in question and taking the determinant of the 2x2 matrix. I just don't get why I am doing this. I don't understand what I'm doing, only how to do it.
 
I'm not familiar with the notation ##\partial (u,v)/\partial(x,z)##. How is it defined? I can see how you're computing it, but is it defined as that determinant?
 
Fredrik said:
I'm not familiar with the notation ##\partial (u,v)/\partial(x,z)##. How is it defined? I can see how you're computing it, but is it defined as that determinant?

##\frac{∂(x_1,...,x_n)}{∂(v_1,...,v_n)} =

\left| \begin{array}{ccc}
({x_{1}})_{v_1} & ... & ({x_{1}})_{v_n} \\
... & ... & ... \\
({x_{n}})_{v_1} & ... & ({x_{n}})_{v_n} \end{array} \right|##

It's the Jacobian.
 
richyw said:
well I have the matrix derivative, but I still need to get those three partial derivatives. For example I can see that \frac{\partial (u,v)}{\partial (x,y)}=\left|\begin{matrix} 2 & 3y^2 \\ e^{5y-7z} & 5xe^{5y-7z} \end{matrix}\right|=(10x-3y^2)e^{5y-7z}so I am taking the components of my matrix derivative that are in question and taking the determinant of the 2x2 matrix. I just don't get why I am doing this. I don't understand what I'm doing, only how to do it.

If you are supposed to find Df, which is a matrix of the partial derivatives of all the components against all the variables, which happens to be 2x3 in this case, then why do you care about a 2x2 matrix (and its determinant) of some partial derivatives? And the answer is, you should not. Just compute all the partials, as requested, and be done with that.
 
Zondrina said:
##\frac{∂(x_1,...,x_n)}{∂(v_1,...,v_n)} =

\left| \begin{array}{ccc}
({x_{1}})_{v_1} & ... & ({x_{1}})_{v_n} \\
... & ... & ... \\
({x_{n}})_{v_1} & ... & ({x_{n}})_{v_n} \end{array} \right|##

It's the Jacobian.
Is it really? The u and v that are given in the problem are functions of three variables, but only two of them appear in these "Jacobians".
 
Last edited:
voko said:
If you are supposed to find Df, which is a matrix of the partial derivatives of all the components against all the variables, which happens to be 2x3 in this case, then why do you care about a 2x2 matrix (and its determinant) of some partial derivatives? And the answer is, you should not. Just compute all the partials, as requested, and be done with that.
Apparently he's not just supposed to find Df(x,y,z). The problem is asking specifically for those determinants.
 
  • #10
voko said:
then why do you care about a 2x2 matrix (and its determinant) of some partial derivatives? And the answer is, you should not. Just compute all the partials, as requested, and be done with that.

but that's the thing. I'm getting the 3 requested partials by taking the determinant of those 2x2 matrices. I computed the matrix derivative as requested, but I am not sure what I am actually "doing" when I am asked to find those partial derivatives. I'm not even sure what the thing I am finding represents. All I know how to do is compute it for the test!

my textbook is "Folland, Advanced Calculus" and this is chapter 2.10, i case anyone has that book
 
  • #11
richyw said:
but that's the thing. I'm getting the 3 requested partials by taking the determinant of those 2x2 matrices.
But the requested things aren't partial derivatives, are they? Can you post the definitions and theorems that make you think that you should compute those determinants. (I'm not saying that you're wrong, only that I need to see some definitions).

richyw said:
my textbook is "Folland, Advanced Calculus" and this is chapter 2.10, i case anyone has that book
There's no preview at google books, and I was unable to find a pdf online.
 
  • #12
hmm ok well I think I will have to put this one on hold until the weekend. afterall I can get the marks on the test and that's what school all about right! haha.
 
  • #13
It seems to me that you know how to get the result, but you don't really understand the significance of the result. Is that correct? I am not familiar with that textbook, and the comments on Amazon are not very encouraging, but perhaps you should try re-reading the relevant part on theory.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K