QM: Time development of the probability of an Eigenvalue

  • #1
21
1
The problem is actually of an introductory leven in Quantum Mechanics. I am doing a course on atomic and molecular physics and they wanted us to practice again some of the basics.
I want to know where I went conceptually wrong because my answer doesn't give a total probability of one, which of course is wrong.

Homework Statement



[tex]\hat{H}\Psi_1=E_1\Psi_1\quad and\quad\hat{H}\Psi_2=E_2\Psi_2[/tex]

[tex]\phi_1=(\Psi_1-\Psi_2)/\sqrt2\quad and\quad\phi_2=(\Psi_1+\Psi_2)/\sqrt2[/tex]

[tex]\hat{A}\phi_1=a_1\quad and\quad\hat{A}\phi_2=a_2[/tex]

The question goes like this: Assuming you measure A^ and find a1, then how does the probability of finding the same result (a1) change over time?

Homework Equations



Well, the only important equation is the time development for a wave function in an eigenstate of the Hamilton Operator.

[tex]\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar)[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



After measurement the wave function collapses so the state wave function becomes Φ1. Since we know that [tex]\phi_1=(\Psi_1-\Psi_2)/\sqrt2\ [/tex] we know that the time-dependent wave function will be: [tex]\Psi=(\Psi_1\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar)-\Psi_2\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar))/\sqrt2\ [/tex]

Thus if we take [tex]<\Psi|\hat{A}|\Psi> [/tex] it is
[tex]<(\Psi_1\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar)-\Psi_2\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar))/\sqrt2\ |\hat{A}|(\Psi_1\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar)-\Psi_2\exp(-iE_jt/\hbar))/\sqrt2\ > [/tex]
[tex] = 1/2 (<\Psi_1|\hat{A}|\Psi_1> + <\Psi_2|\hat{A}|\Psi_2> - 2<\Psi_1|\hat{A}|\Psi_2>\cos((E1-E2)t/\hbar))[/tex]
[tex] = 1/2 ( 1/2(a_1+a_2) + 1/2(a_2-a_1) - 2<\Psi_1|\hat{A}|\Psi_2>\cos((E1-E2)t/\hbar)))[/tex]
[tex] = 1/2( a_2 - \cos((E_1-E_2)t/\hbar))(a_2-a_1))[/tex]
[tex] = a_2/2 - \cos((E_1-E_2)t/\hbar))(a_2-a_1)/2[/tex]

I don't think this can be true, since when the cosinus is 0 the result is a2/2, thus violating the fact that the sum of the factors should be one... And when one is to insert t=0 one becomes a1/2 and not a1 as expected.

Could someone tell me where I went conceptually wrong? Thanks in advance :D
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
21
1
I calculated again and my mistake was with [tex]<\Psi_2|\hat{A}|\Psi_2>[/tex]
It is 1/2(a2 + a1) not 1/2(a2 - a1)
 

Related Threads on QM: Time development of the probability of an Eigenvalue

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
11K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
697
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
951
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Top