How Do You Calculate 3rd and 4th Hermite Polynomials?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the third and fourth Hermite polynomials, focusing on the mathematical expressions and techniques involved in their derivation. Participants are exploring the use of generating functions and operator methods related to Hermite polynomials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express uncertainty about applying the generating formula for Hermite polynomials, particularly when raising the operator to higher powers. There are questions regarding the interpretation of the equations provided and how to utilize them effectively.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with some participants seeking clarification on the application of the formulas and others sharing insights about the operator method. There is a recognition of differing interpretations of the equations, and some guidance has been offered regarding the correct application of the operator.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention confusion stemming from examples in their textbook and the need for a clearer understanding of the generating functions and their application. There is an acknowledgment of potential gaps in knowledge regarding the manipulation of differential operators in the context of Hermite polynomials.

nmsurobert
Messages
288
Reaction score
36

Homework Statement


Calculate the third and fourth hermite polynomials

Homework Equations


(1/√n!)(√(mω/2ħ))n(x - ħ/mω d/dx)n(mω/πħ)1/4 e-mωx2/2ħ

ak+2/ak = 2(k-n)/((k+2)(k+1))

The Attempt at a Solution


i kind of understand how how to find the polynomials using the first equation up to n=1. I'm not sure i want to attempt to find it with n=3 because that will make (x - ħ/mω d/dx)n raised to the 3rd power. and then the 4th power.
we are provided with the second equation but i don't understand how to use it. there is an example in the book (townsend) and does the first 3 polynomials but the example makes no sense to me.

can anyone provide me with some insight?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nmsurobert said:

Homework Statement


Calculate the third and fourth hermite polynomials

Homework Equations


(1/√n!)(√(mω/2ħ))n(x - ħ/mω d/dx)n(mω/πħ)1/4 e-mωx2/2ħ

ak+2/ak = 2(k-n)/((k+2)(k+1))

The Attempt at a Solution


i kind of understand how how to find the polynomials using the first equation up to n=1. I'm not sure i want to attempt to find it with n=3 because that will make (x - ħ/mω d/dx)n raised to the 3rd power. and then the 4th power.
we are provided with the second equation but i don't understand how to use it. there is an example in the book (townsend) and does the first 3 polynomials but the example makes no sense to me.

can anyone provide me with some insight?
It's not clear where you obtained this generating formula for Hermite polynomials, nor what the difficulty is with the alternate representation.

This article discusses other, simpler generating formulas for Hermite polynomials:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermite_polynomials

You shouldn't have to split the atom to come up with these.
 
The difficulty with the alternate representation is I don't understand how to use it.
Apparently when n=1, the solution is X. Where does that come from?
 
Even using one of the other formulas on Wikipedia like

(X - d/dx)n

For n=1, d/dx = 0 so the solution is X. I see that.

But for n=2 the solution is x2 -1.

Why isn't it just x2 don't all the d/dx go to zero?
 
Even if I write it out as x^2 -d/dx(2x) + (d/dx)^2
I still don't get the correct solution for n=2.
 
nmsurobert said:
Even using one of the other formulas on Wikipedia like

(X - d/dx)n

For n=1, d/dx = 0 so the solution is X. I see that.
You shouldn't see that d/dx=0 because that's wrong. You need to apply the operator to ##e^{-x^2/2}## and then multiply the result by ##e^{x^2/2}##. For ##n=1##, you get
$$H_1(x) = e^{x^2/2} \left(x - \frac{d}{dx}\right)^1 e^{-x^2/2} = e^{x^2/2} (x e^{-x^2/2} + x e^{-x^2/2}) = 2x$$
 
vela said:
You shouldn't see that d/dx=0 because that's wrong. You need to apply the operator to ##e^{-x^2/2}## and then multiply the result by ##e^{x^2/2}##. For ##n=1##, you get
$$H_1(x) = e^{x^2/2} \left(x - \frac{d}{dx}\right)^1 e^{-x^2/2} = e^{x^2/2} (x e^{-x^2/2} + x e^{-x^2/2}) = 2x$$

ahhhh that makes sense. i spoke to the instructor and he cleared it up a bit for me too but he didn't explain it like that. thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K