How Do You Calculate Acceleration in a Limacon-Shaped Path?

Click For Summary
To calculate the acceleration of slider blocks on a limacon-shaped path, the rod OA rotates clockwise at a constant angular velocity of 6 rad/s. The equation for the limacon is r = 200*(2-cosθ), and at θ = 135°, r calculates to 541.42 mm. The normal and tangential acceleration components are determined, with r' and r'' yielding values of 848.53 mm/s and -5091.17 mm/s², respectively. The discussion emphasizes the importance of sign conventions, noting that a clockwise rotation results in a negative angular velocity. Ultimately, the correct calculation of acceleration hinges on careful attention to these signs.
Nikstykal
Messages
29
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The rod OA rotates clockwise with a constant angular velocity of 6 rad/s. Two pin-connected slider blocks located at B move freely on OA and the curved rod whose shape is a limacon described by the equation r = 200*(2-cosθ) mm. Determine the magnitude of the acceleration of the slider blocks at the instant θ = 135°.
QcsaAag.jpg

Homework Equations


αr=r''-rθ'2
αθ=rθ''+2r'θ'
α = √(αr2θ2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I am trying to solve for the magnitude using the normal and tangential acceleration components.
r = 200*(2-cosθ) --> r(135) = 541.42 mm θ' = 6 rad/s
r' = 200 sinθ * θ' --> r'(135) = 848.53 mm/s θ'' = 0
r'' = 200cosθ * θ'2= -5091.17 mm/s2

When I plug all those values in I keep getting the wrong answer. Can someone tell me where I am going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Careful with the signs. Note that the rod is rotating clockwise.
 
TSny said:
Careful with the signs. Note that the rod is rotating clockwise.

Can you explain that more? Is this because there is a negative change in θ over time?
 
I ended up getting the right answer, must have just been a miscalculation.
 
Nikstykal said:
Can you explain that more? Is this because there is a negative change in θ over time?
Yes. In the figure, ##\theta## increases in the counterclockwise direction. Therefore, if the rod rotates clockwise, ##\dot{\theta}## is a negative number. You should find that ##\dot{r}## is negative when ##\theta = 135^o##.
 
TSny said:
Yes. In the figure, ##\theta## increases in the counterclockwise direction. Therefore, if the rod rotates clockwise, ##\dot{\theta}## is a negative number. You should find that ##\dot{r}## is negative when ##\theta = 135^o##.

Okay I understand that. Thank you for explaining. I just go lucky in my calculations because they ended up cancelling the negatives out.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K