How Do You Calculate Charge on Capacitors in a Circuit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ma3088
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge on capacitors in a circuit with four capacitors connected between points a and b. The equivalent capacitance was determined to be 6.54μF, and the charges on the 24.0μF and 7.00μF capacitors were correctly calculated as 108μC and 84.0μC, respectively. However, the calculations for the 2.00μF and 14.0μF capacitors were incorrect, prompting requests for assistance in verifying the calculations. The voltage across the capacitors is consistently noted as ΔVab = 16.5V.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor charge calculations
  • Knowledge of equivalent capacitance in series and parallel configurations
  • Familiarity with basic circuit analysis techniques
  • Proficiency in using the formula Q = C × ΔV
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of calculating equivalent capacitance for series and parallel capacitors
  • Study the formula Q = C × ΔV in detail
  • Learn how to analyze circuits with multiple capacitors
  • Practice solving capacitor charge problems with varying configurations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of capacitor behavior in circuits.

ma3088
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Four capacitors are connected as shown in the figure below:
2930121411_c18fe7cb68_o.png


The Attempt at a Solution



(a) Find the equivalent capacitance between points a and b.
I found it to be 6.54μF.

(b) If ΔVab = 16.5 V calculate the charge on the the 24.0 μF capacitor.
108 μF (correct)

(c) If ΔVab = 16.5 V calculate the charge on the the 7.00 μF capacitor.
84.0 μF (correct)

(d) If ΔVab = 16.5 V calculate the charge on the the 2.00 μF capacitor.
I got 24.0 but its not correct.

(e) If ΔVab = 16.5 V calculate the charge on the the capacitor C, which equals 14.0 μF.
Likewise here.

Any help on parts d and e is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should start by checking your calculations for part(a); I get a slightly different answer than you. If you show me your work, I can show you where you went wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K