How Do You Calculate Constant Angular Acceleration?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the constant angular acceleration of a rotating wheel given its angular displacement and final angular velocity over a specific time interval.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various equations related to angular motion, including those involving final and initial angular velocities, angular displacement, and time. There is a focus on the complexity of the calculations and the appropriateness of different formulas.

Discussion Status

Some participants express confusion regarding the application of certain equations and their relationships to angular displacement. Others provide alternative equations and suggest methods for isolating variables, indicating a productive exploration of the topic without reaching a consensus on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the potential for misunderstanding the problem setup and the need for clarity regarding the variables involved, particularly the role of angular displacement in the calculations.

rambo5330
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rotating wheel requires 3.00 s to rotate 232.5 rads. It's angular velocity at the end of the 3.00 s interval is 98 rad/s. whatis the constant angular acceleration of the wheel?


Homework Equations


Not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


Is this question more complex than it looks or what am I missing, I have solved it by useing the equation
Wfinal2 = Winitial2 +2(angular accel)(angular displacement)

and subbing in the value of angular accel with the formula (Wfinal - Winitial/T)

then useing the quadratic formula to solve ,
I get the right answer but it seems cumbersome, what are your thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Constant acceleration. What you're doing is correct.

I would have used the following equation though.

Wf = Wo + (angular accel)t
 
when I use the equation you recommend

Wf = Wo + (angular accel)t

and sub in angular accel = (wf - w0 / t ) everything cancels and I am left with wf = wf

Been studying non stop my brain may be fried, what am I missing?

is it because that equation does not invole angular displacement?
 
Sorry i misinterpreted the question. Wo = Wf - (a)t ; Also,

Wo = sqr(wf^2-2(a)d); So,

Wf - (a)t = sqr(wf^2 - 2(a)d)

Solve (a).
 
Thanks for clarifying that !
 
Note that if you isolate (a) in both equations then solve Wo and use Wo to solve (a) it will still work.

It's just that method requires back substitution, which takes longer (and more algebra ;) ).

If you know what you're looking for you can usually shorten the process up!
 
Found the easy way... Wave = (Wf + W0)/2
so (Wave * 2) - Wf = W0

(Wf - W0 )/ T = Angular Accel
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K