How Do You Calculate Error Propagation for Logarithmic Functions?

Click For Summary
To calculate error propagation for logarithmic functions, the discussion focuses on estimating absolute and relative standard deviations for the expression z=5.64(s=0.14)*log(138)(s=3). Two methods were proposed, with the first yielding a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 11.6% and the second an RSD of 0.08%. A suggestion was made to consider the relative uncertainty of log(138) as 2.14±0.01, emphasizing the importance of accurately reflecting the effect of uncertainties on the final result. The recommended approach involves using the root sum of squares (RSS) of relative uncertainties according to the product rule for more precise calculations. This discussion highlights the complexity of error propagation in logarithmic functions and the need for careful consideration of uncertainties.
prize fight
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
1. Homework Statement
Estimate the absolute and relative standard deviations of the following calculations. The number in parentheses is the standard deviation of the preceding value.

a) z=5.64(s=0.14)*log(138)(s=3)

2. Homework Equations
Sx/x =SQRT((Sp/P)2+(Sq/q)2+(Sr/R)2

Sx=0.434(Sp/P)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I thought of two ways to go about the problem I am not sure which way is correct here are both attempts:

log(138)= 2.139
Z=12.069
SZ=SQRT((0.14/5.64)2+(3.0/2.139)2)=1.40
Z=12.07 LaTeX Code: \\pm 1.40

RSD=(1.4/12.07)*100 =11.6%

Or my other attempt:

Z=12.07
(0.14/5.64)2+(0.434*(3.0/138))=0.01
Z=12.07LaTeX Code: \\pm 0.01
RSD=(0.01/12.07)*100=0.08%

Are either of these ways correct? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
prize fight said:
1. Homework Statement
Estimate the absolute and relative standard deviations of the following calculations. The number in parentheses is the standard deviation of the preceding value.

a) z=5.64(s=0.14)*log(138)(s=3)

2. Homework Equations
Sx/x =SQRT((Sp/P)2+(Sq/q)2+(Sr/R)2

Sx=0.434(Sp/P)

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I thought of two ways to go about the problem I am not sure which way is correct here are both attempts:

log(138)= 2.139
Z=12.069
SZ=SQRT((0.14/5.64)2+(3.0/2.139)2)=1.40
Z=12.07 LaTeX Code: \\pm 1.40

RSD=(1.4/12.07)*100 =11.6%

Or my other attempt:

Z=12.07
(0.14/5.64)2+(0.434*(3.0/138))=0.01
Z=12.07LaTeX Code: \\pm 0.01
RSD=(0.01/12.07)*100=0.08%

Are either of these ways correct? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.

I would choose a different approach. For:

z=5.64(s=0.14)*log(138)(s=3)

Certainly the RSS of the relative uncertainties is a good method. But in that regard I would prefer to treat the relative error of the 3/138 as really the relative uncertainty of the range of Log(138 ±3) which looks to me more like 2.14±.01, because that is the effect on the final result, as opposed to the 3/138.

Then I would choose to take the RSS of these relative terms according to the product rule.

((.14/5.64)2 + (.01/2.14)2)1/2

And calculate the absolute uncertainty from that expression.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
2K