How Do You Calculate Initial Angular Velocity with Constant Acceleration?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
blue5t1053
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Question:
A flywheel has a constant angular acceleration of 2 rad/sec^2. During the 19 sec time period from t1 to t2 the wheel rotates through an angle of 15 radians. What was the magnitude of the angular velocity of the wheel at time t1?

Hint: let t1=0 sec, and t2=t

Equations:
[tex]\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + \alpha t ^{2}[/tex]

My Work:
[tex](15 radians) - (0 radians) = \omega_{0} (19 sec) + (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}[/tex]

[tex](15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2} = \omega_{0} (19 sec)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}}{(19 sec)} = \omega_{0}[/tex]

[tex]\omega_{0} = (-18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} = (18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} \ for \ magnitude; \ at \ t1[/tex]

Did I do everything right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
blue5t1053 said:
Question:
A flywheel has a constant angular acceleration of 2 rad/sec^2. During the 19 sec time period from t1 to t2 the wheel rotates through an angle of 15 radians. What was the magnitude of the angular velocity of the wheel at time t1?

Hint: let t1=0 sec, and t2=t

Equations:
[tex]\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + \alpha t ^{2}[/tex]

My Work:
[tex](15 radians) - (0 radians) = \omega_{0} (19 sec) + (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}[/tex]

[tex](15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2} = \omega_{0} (19 sec)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(15 radians) - (2 \frac{rad}{sec^{2}})(19 sec )^{2}}{(19 sec)} = \omega_{0}[/tex]

You're good up to here.

[tex]\omega_{0} = (-18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} = (18.2)\frac{rad}{sec} \ for \ magnitude; \ at \ t1[/tex]

You've miscalculated. You should get something close to 37 rad/s for the magnitude.
 
I think your equation is wrong

Should it not be

theta(final) - theta(initial) = time * angular velocity(initial) + (1/2) * angular acceleration * time^2.

similar to the equation in linear motion?
 
manjuvenamma said:
I think your equation is wrong
You are right.
blue5t1053 said:
Equations:
[tex]\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + \alpha t ^{2}[/tex]
That should be:
[tex]\vartheta - \vartheta_{0} = \omega_{0} t + (1/2)\alpha t ^{2}[/tex]