How Do You Calculate Mass M1 in a Frictional Inclined Plane Pulley System?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a frictional inclined plane pulley system with two masses, M1 and M2. The goal is to determine the mass M1 given the acceleration of M2, the angle of the incline, and the coefficient of kinetic friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss free body diagrams for both masses, identifying forces such as tension, gravitational force, normal force, and friction. There are attempts to write equations based on Newton's second law for each mass, with some participants expressing confusion about how to algebraically manipulate these equations.

Discussion Status

Multiple participants are actively working through the problem, sharing their equations and reasoning. Some have expressed uncertainty about their results, noting that their calculated values for M1 seem unrealistic given the conditions of the problem. There is a recognition of the need to check assumptions and calculations, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention that M2 is accelerating downwards, which implies that M1 must be moving up the incline. There is ongoing discussion about the implications of the forces involved and the relationships between the masses, with some participants questioning the validity of the problem setup itself.

  • #31
I don't see how it is possible for M1 to weigh more than M2, yet M2 is pulling M1 up the plane?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
bulldog23 said:
I don't see how it is possible for M1 to weigh more than M2, yet M2 is pulling M1 up the plane?

Actually, it may be possible for m2 to be accelerating upwards, the M1 down the plane
 
  • #33
but the problem specifically says that M2 is accelerating downwards, so that means that M1 must be going up the plane.
 
  • #34
deleting incorrect/misleading response...
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Ah... then we certainly do have quite the problem n_n;
anyway, I really have to go now~
I wish you the best of luck~
 
  • #36
hotvette said:
Why would the problem be wrong? Think about the essence of what's going on. There is a mass under full gravity pulling another mass being resisted by only partial gravity (i.e. \mu g \cos \theta). It would be an interesting exercise to calculate just how big M1 would need to be such that the acceleration is just barely zero...

You bring up a good point~
 
  • #37
getting 10.1kg here

for m1 you have:

T-m_1g\sin\theta-f_k=m_1a
T-m_1g\sin\theta-\mu_km_1g\cos\theta=m_1a
Since Tension is pulling it up, gravity and friction are pulling down.

for m2:

T-m_2g=m_2a
T=m_2a+m_2g
since you know m2a (3.27 down) you can find a ~ -.503 m/s^2
and the tension ~60.495

plugging in the tension, gravity, angle, acceleration into the formula for m1 you can solve for m1 and get ~10.1kg
 
Last edited:
  • #38
Duh! I totally left out the component of gravity on M1! That would make M1 smaller, though, not bigger...

This is precisely what happens when one is rushing and isn't careful about including all the forces involved... geesh, and a homework helper should know better!

I'm now getting M1 < M2 like others originally thought. Not a good day...
 
Last edited:
  • #39
wel if you consider the case where the angle is 0 and the block is just vertical like on the edge of a table. and you do the calculation for m1 again m1 will be like 21kg.
 
  • #40
See its a problem having no complications except the FBD

Here if you see at the system then you must can understand it all in a go.

The equations would be like this

m_2g - T = m_2a

T - m_1gsin\theta\ - {\mu\{m_1gcos}\theta\} = m_1a
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K