How Do You Calculate Maximum Speed from a Non-Constant Acceleration Time Graph?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum speed of a particle from a non-constant acceleration versus time graph. The original poster presents a scenario where the particle starts from rest, and participants explore the implications of the acceleration graph on the velocity calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between acceleration and velocity, particularly focusing on how to integrate a non-constant acceleration function. There are attempts to express acceleration as a function of time and integrate it correctly. Questions arise regarding the initial conditions of acceleration and the definition of rest in relation to acceleration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on integration techniques and clarifying concepts related to acceleration and velocity. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made in the problem setup, particularly concerning the initial conditions of the particle's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion regarding the definition of rest and the implications of initial acceleration in the context of the problem. The original poster's approach to the problem is challenged, leading to a deeper examination of the underlying physics concepts.

Suraj M
Gold Member
Messages
596
Reaction score
39

Homework Statement


A particle starts from rest. Its acceleration vs time graph is as shown. What will be the maximum speed?
WIN_20150312_160506.JPG

Homework Equations


usual kinematic equations(3+)

The Attempt at a Solution


velocity at t=11 seconds should be max, so the area under the given graph = change in velocity
So vf-0 = 55
so max. velocity= 55 m/s
But, if i try it this way:
##a=\frac{dv}{dt}##
##a.dt=dv##
integrating..
##a∫_{0}^{11} dt = ∫_{0}^{v} dv##
so ##a(11-0)=v-0##
i know this is wrong because ##a## is not constant. But how do i include it?
Any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Suraj M said:
a.dt=dva.dt=dv
integrating..
a∫₀11dt=∫₀vdva∫₀^{11} dt = ∫₀^{v} dv

Since a is a function of time, ∫adt is not a∫dt

You need to write a as a function of t then integrate it correctly.
 
But if a particle starts from rest and its acceleration vs time graph is as shown, I ask to myself why at the intial time the initial acceleration is not null?
 
I ask to myself why at the initial time the initial acceleration is not null?
You could equally ask, why the question chose to set time 0 at the moment the acceleration starts.
Seems a sensible choice. Say the acceleration is given by a spring which is compressed. It could sit in that state indefinitely, until you release the particle. Then something interesting happens, so you start measuring from that moment and call that t=0.

To keep you happy, acceleration was 0 or null at t=-1, t=-7.5, t= -0.000000000000000000001, but rises to 10 m/sec2 (or whatever that blurred figure is) at t=0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pierce610 and Suraj M
Merlin3189 said:
Since a is a function of time, ∫adt is not a∫dt

You need to write a as a function of t then integrate it correctly.
oh yeah, i don't how i missed that..
so ##a=10-βt## where ##β= \frac{da}{dt}##
so ##β=\frac{10}{11}##
so i get $$∫_{0}^{11}(10 - \frac{10}{11}t)dt =∫_{0}^{v}dv$$
so then i get ## 10(11-0)-(\frac{10}{11}).(11^2 -0) = v##
so ##v = 110-110=0## huh?
 
Suraj M said:
so i get ##∫_{0}^{11}(10 - \frac{10}{11}t)dt ##
Try this integration again. Show intermediate steps.
 
NascentOxygen said:
Try this integration again. Show intermediate steps.
$$∫_{0}^{11}(10dt -\frac{10}{11}tdt)=∫_{0}^{v_f}dv$$
$$10(t_f -0) - \frac{10}{11}(\frac{t_f^2}{2}-0)=v_f-0$$
so then substituting ##t_f=11##
Ok got it.. thanks, sorry for the stupid mistake
 
Last edited:
What is the integral of tdt? (Hint: it's not t2)

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Suraj M
Pierce610 said:
But if a particle starts from rest and its acceleration vs time graph is as shown, I ask to myself why at the intial time the initial acceleration is not null?
What physical law that you are aware of says that the acceleration of a particle has to be continuous with time?

Chet
 
  • #10
Yes. It's just your integral.
∫ k dt = kt , but ∫ kt dt ≠ kt2

Try differentiating kt2 and see what you get.

Edit - You posted the right answer while I was writing this!
 
  • #11
Merlin3189 said:
Yes. It's just your integral.
∫ k dt = kt , but ∫ kt dt ≠ kt2

Try differentiating kt2 and see what you get.
Thank you, i corrected it.. in post #7
thank you for your help.
 
  • #12
Mr. Chet ,
I wanted only say that the particle in question is defined to "start at rest" while in the graph, for how I think to interpret it,seems to start with an initial acceleration not null. Isn't definition of rest "no acceleration"?
 
  • #13
Pierce610 said:
Mr. Chet ,
I wanted only say that the particle in question is defined to "start at rest" while in the graph, for how I think to interpret it,seems to start with an initial acceleration not null. Isn't definition of rest "no acceleration"?
No. Definition of "at rest" is zero velocity.

Chet
 
  • #14
Chestermiller said:
No. Definition of "at rest" is zero velocity.

Chet
and then also the acceleration?
 
  • #15
Pierce610 said:
and then also the acceleration?
No. Acceleration is rate of change of velocity.
 
  • #16
but then let me know how is the acceleration of a particle at rest, that is with speed null?
 
  • #17
Pierce610 said:
but then let me know how is the acceleration of a particle at rest, that is with speed null?
Imagine that, at times t<0, the velocity is zero, and at times t>0, the velocity is kt, where k is a constant. So the velocity is a continuous function of time. What is the acceleration at times t < 0? What is the acceleration at times t > 0? Is the acceleration a continuous function of time at t = 0?

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pierce610
  • #18
I've understand: before a particle moves with constant speed v, it needs to be accelerated.
It can't move from 0 to v instantly. Also in free fall it should be an acceleration not null at the start time, 9.8 m/s^2
 
  • #19
Pierce610 said:
but then let me know how is the acceleration of a particle at rest, that is with speed null?
If a stationary particle were to have no acceleration, it would forever remain at rest.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K