How Do You Calculate the Charge on Beads in a Hemispherical Bowl?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge on two identical beads with mass m and charge q, placed in a hemispherical bowl of radius R. The beads achieve equilibrium at a distance R apart, requiring the application of Coulomb's Law and the balance of forces in both x and y directions. Key equations include F = k_e * (q1 * q2) / (distance)^2, with k_e valued at 8.9 x 10^9. Participants clarified the presence of both x and y components of the electrostatic force, leading to the correct equilibrium equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electrostatic force calculations
  • Basic principles of equilibrium in physics
  • Understanding of forces in two dimensions
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their application in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Coulomb's Law in different scenarios
  • Learn about equilibrium conditions in two-dimensional force systems
  • Explore the role of trigonometric functions in resolving forces
  • Practice similar physics problems involving electrostatics and equilibrium
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone preparing for exams involving electrostatics and force equilibrium concepts.

Hov
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Two identical beads each have a mass m and charge q. When placed in a hemispherical bowl of radius R with frictionless, nonconducting walls, the beads move, and at equilibrium they are a distance R apart. Determine the charge on each bead. (Use k_e for ke, g for the acceleration due to gravity, m, and R as necessary.)"

Here's a picture:

http://img3.imageshack.us/i/p2368.gif

Homework Equations



Relevant equations include Coulomb's Law, and other elementary physics equations.

F = Ke * (q1) * (q2) / (distance)2

Where Ke = 8.9 x 109

The Attempt at a Solution



So what I've gotten so far is this:

Using the left-most ball as a model, there's a force in the negative x direction from the ball on the right. That force is exactly

F = -Ke * (qe)2/R2

Now there's a y component of the normal force from the hemisphere given by:

mgsin(x) = N

So, I also figured that the normal and the gravitational forces should each have an x component and that it should be equal and opposite of the force from the charge on the right:

Ncos(x) = Force from the charge

So here's what I did from there:

Ncos(x) = Ke * (qe)2/R2
Nsin(x) = mg

tan(x) = mg / ( Ke * (qe)2/R2 )

R2 / tan(x)mg = Ke * (qe)2

R2 / tan(x)mg * Ke = (qe)2

And ended up with:

qe = sqrt ( R2 / tan(x)mg * Ke )

Which is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
One component of weight of the bead balances the normal reaction and other component pulls it down.
One component of force of the bead balances the normal reaction and other component pulls it up along the hemisphere.
 
rl.bhat said:
One component of weight of the bead balances the normal reaction and other component pulls it down.
One component of force of the bead balances the normal reaction and other component pulls it up along the hemisphere.

Thank you for your reply.

So just to be clear, the charge force has a y component, even in equilibrium? I was under the assumption that it only had an x component.
 
Hov said:
Thank you for your reply.

So just to be clear, the charge force has a y component, even in equilibrium? I was under the assumption that it only had an x component.

Yes. It has both the components.
 
I'm still stuck on this problem. :(
 
Hov said:
I'm still stuck on this problem. :(
If θ is the angle between electrostatic force and normal, then
F*cosθ = mg*sinθ
F*sinθ + mg*cos = N
 
This was a homework question on Webassign. I got it wrong.

But I need to know how to do this for my test on Thursday. Some classmates said that there is no reference to theta in the final answer because it's an equilateral triangle.

Can anyone help me further? I'm very lost on this.

Here is another image since the first one was apparently taken down.

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/9582/p2368.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Never mind, got it. I wasn't too far off in my original attempt.

Nsinθ = mg

is the correct equation. It makes perfect sense now. But I still don't understand why this equation:

N = mgcosθ

Doesn't work. Does anyone know why? According to my diagram, the two forces should be equal.
 
Sorry.In my post #6, the sin and cos are interchanged. It should be
F*sinθ = mg*cosθ. Here θ = 60 degrees. Try it.
 
  • #10
I don't think that's correct.

The system of equations should be:

Y component: Nsinθ = mg
X component: Ncosθ = Fe

I understand how to do this problem now, and got the correct answer (finally). My question now is why couldn't the first equation be written as:

N = mgcosθ

Because according to the diagram, wouldn't these two be equal?

Thanks again for your help rl.bhat.
 
  • #11
In equilibrium condition your method is correct.
You will get the same result if you use the equations in my post 9#
Here N consist of two components.If you take the angle between the vertical and normal as θ, then
N = mg*cosθ + F*sinθ
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
866
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K