How Do You Calculate the Lagrangian for a Rolling Disk?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the Lagrangian for a uniform thin disk rolling without slipping on a plane, with a force applied at its center parallel to the plane. The discussion centers around expressing the kinetic energy in terms of appropriate coordinates and understanding the implications of the applied force on the motion of the disk.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the expression of kinetic energy in polar coordinates and the implications of the applied force on the disk's motion. Questions arise regarding the differentiation of the Lagrangian with respect to generalized coordinates and the relationship between translational and rotational motion.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct formulation of the Lagrangian and the kinetic energy components. Some participants confirm the correctness of the expressions used, while others seek clarification on the application of the rolling without slipping condition and how it affects the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption of zero potential energy and the need to account for both translational and rotational kinetic energy in the context of the applied force. There is also mention of constraints related to the motion of the disk.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A uniform thin disk rolls without slipping on a plane and a force is being applied at its center parallel to the plane. Find the lagrangian and thereby the generalized force.

Homework Equations


Lagranges equation.

The Attempt at a Solution


This is my first ever exercise of this kind. We first note that U=0 so the lagrangian is simply L=T. We then want to express the kinetic energy T in terms of coordinates, which contain the constraints of the motion implicitly. Therefore we should use polar coordinates. Correct so far?
We then get:
L = T = ½m(\omega2r2) (1)

And now lagranges equation says:

d/dt[dT/dqj'] - dT/dqj = Qj
where Qj is the generalized force. There is for this motion one equation of the above kind - one for theta and one for r.

Should I now just differentiate with respect to r and \theta and make two separate equations of the above kind of which I can find the components of the generalized force?
I just don't get anything very sensible when I differentiate the expression for L above with the two variables, and when my teacher did it I think he just differentiated with respect to x - why is that? Shouldn't you use the generalized coordinates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaaa202 said:
This is my first ever exercise of this kind. We first note that U=0 so the lagrangian is simply L=T. We then want to express the kinetic energy T in terms of coordinates, which contain the constraints of the motion implicitly. Therefore we should use polar coordinates. Correct so far?
We then get:
L = T = ½m(\omega2r2) (1)

This is what you would get for a disk that was freely spinning subject to no external forces. You need to include the facts that there is a force being applied to the center of the disk,parallel to the plane (what does that mean for the disk, will it only spin or will it have translational motion as well?) and that the disk rolls without slipping (this should give you some relationship between the motion of the center of the disk, and the angular speed of the disk)
 
oh yes right.

So T=½Mv2 + ½I\omega2 = ½(M\omega2R2 + I\omega2)

The translational plus rotational kinetic energy. Do I need this? For rolling without slipping v=\omegaR but I am not sure where to use this.
 
Last edited:
hey man, is the above correct?
 
Yeah, it's correct. You've already used ##v=\omega R## to eliminate ##x## and ##\dot{x}##, so now you're just left with ##\theta## and ##\omega=\dot{\theta}##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K