How Do You Calculate the Radius of a Cylinder from Its Label Area and Height?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neuro.akn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the radius of a cylindrical can based on the area of its label and its height, with the area expressed as a polynomial in terms of a variable x and the height defined as a linear function of x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the area of the label and the dimensions of the cylinder, considering the unrolling of the label into a rectangle. There are attempts to equate the area expressions and questions about how to isolate the radius from the resulting equation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of how to manipulate the equations to solve for the radius. Some participants express uncertainty about the steps involved, while others suggest equating the two area expressions and performing algebraic operations to isolate the radius. Discrepancies in understanding the simplification of terms have been noted.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through algebraic manipulations and clarifying misunderstandings about polynomial operations. There is a focus on ensuring the correctness of mathematical operations without arriving at a definitive solution.

neuro.akn
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The area of a label on a cylindrical can is defined by

A = 16(pi)x^2 - 68(pi)x + 42(pi). If the height of the can is defined as

h = 2x - 7, determine the radius of the can.

*Note: the (pi) represents a pi symbol; it would not work on my computer*


Homework Equations

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's imagine taking the label off of the can and unrolling it.

Then we should end up with a rectangle whose area = L*W.

But the width= height of the label= 2x-7

and the length= the circumference= 2 (pi) r.

Make sense now?
 
Thank you! This is starting to make sense now, but what would I then need to do with the equation given for the area of the can?
 
I'm not sure how I would solve for the radius, even though what you said makes sense.
 
If we set the two areas equal to each other:

(2x-7) * 2(pi)r = 16(pi)x^2 - 68(pi)x + 42(pi)

Solving for r leads would mean that we have to divide both sides by (2x-7) * 2(pi).

The long division you can try yourself but that will leave you with the radius on the RHS.
 
neuro.akn said:
I'm not sure how I would solve for the radius, even though what you said makes sense.
You have two expressions for the area, one given involving only x, and now another involving r and x. Equate them.
The answer will be in the form r = some function of x. Don't expect to get a number for r.
 
Here is how I am solving:

(2x-7)*2(pi)r = 16(pi)x^2 - 68(pi)x + 42(pi)

I divide each side by (2x-7)*2(pi) but this expression (2x-7)*2(pi) simplifies into -10x.

So I will proceed to long divide 16(pi)x^2 - 68(pi)x + 42(pi) by -10x ?
 
neuro.akn said:
Here is how I am solving:

(2x-7)*2(pi)r = 16(pi)x^2 - 68(pi)x + 42(pi)
Yes
this expression (2x-7)*2(pi) simplifies into -10x.
it does?! How?
So I will proceed to long divide 16(pi)x^2 - 68(pi)x + 42(pi) by -10x ?
No, long divide by (2x-7)*2(pi).
 
When you multiply (2x-7)*2(pi), you get -10x.

Consider:
(2x-7)*2(pi)
= 4(pi)x - 14(pi)
= -10x
 
  • #10
Try it one term at a time. Pi obviously divides out of both sides, etc.

After a couple of steps, one side of the equation is going to be a polynomial that you have to factor.

Long division works.

So does FOIL if you have reason to believe the problem probably isn't particularly difficult and that one of the terms of the polynomial will probably be equal to your height. There's only so many possibilities that you can plug into the other term just using a trial and error method. (In fact, it's not a particularly difficult polynomial to factor even if you didn't already know one of the terms.)
 
  • #11
neuro.akn said:
When you multiply (2x-7)*2(pi), you get -10x.

Consider:
(2x-7)*2(pi)
= 4(pi)x - 14(pi)
= -10x

No offense, but this is really, really wrong and I take back my statement that you'll wind up with a polynomial that's easy to factor.

You can't subract 14(pi) from 4x(pi) and get -10x for a couple of reasons.

If your equation was 4(pi) - 14(pi), your answer would be -10(pi); not -10. Subtraction doesn't cancel out pi.

You can't subtract 14 from 4x and get -10x unless x happens to be 1 or 0 and even then, it would only be coincidence that your answer was correct because you performed an illegal operation.

In fact, if you're at all in doubt that this doesn't work, just let x=2 and do the subtraction you just did. (Whew! Right after I posted this, I looked at the equation and thought, "NO WAY!" Fortunately, if you let x=2, you get -18.85; not -20.)

You could subtract 14x from 4x or you could subtract 14 from 4, or you could subtract 14x^2 from 4x^2, etc.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K