How Do You Calculate Thermal Conductivity Using Kinetic Theory?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The calculation of thermal conductivity using kinetic theory involves the formula k = (1/3) Cmol n λ , where Cmol is the molar heat capacity, n is the number density of gas particles, λ is the mean free path, and is the average molecular speed. In this discussion, the number density was recalculated to n = 2.47 x 1018 molecules/m3, leading to a thermal conductivity value of k = 5.68 x 10-5 W/(m·K). The estimated time for water to cool down to 40 degrees Celsius was found to be approximately 3.7 x 108 seconds, indicating significant heat loss through radiation and conduction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Kinetic theory of gases
  • Ideal gas law (PV = nRT)
  • Heat capacity concepts (Cmol and Cv)
  • Mean free path calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the kinetic theory of gases and its implications for thermal conductivity.
  • Learn about the relationship between pressure, volume, and temperature in the ideal gas law.
  • Investigate the concept of mean free path and its significance in gas behavior.
  • Explore the principles of heat transfer, including conduction, convection, and radiation.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and thermodynamics, particularly those focusing on heat transfer and thermal properties of gases.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Find an expression for thermal conductivity using kinetic theory.

Given a vacuum flask of these dimensions, find the heat loss per unit time.

Estimate the time taken for the water to cool down to 40 deg.

hvcqi8.png



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
k = \frac {1}{3} C_{mol} n λ <c>

Part (b)

Estimate gap to be 0.5cm.

n = \frac {PV}{RT} =\frac {(10^{-2})(3.3*10^{-4})}{(8.31)(293)} = 1.4 * 10^{-9}

Since the the molecular density is so low, we can effectively say the mean free path is the gap. λ ≈ 0.5 cm (Not sure if this is right, but if the molecule would crash into the other end of the fask before it hits the molecule, then the mean free path should definitely be in the order of magnitude of the gap, right?)

Heat Capacity of air should be same order of magnitude as water;
C_{mol} ≈ 10^3 J K^{-1}

<c> ≈ 400 m s^{-1}

Estimate Temperature gradient ≈ ΔT/5cm) = 8000 K/m

Together, k ≈ 9.3*10^{-7} So, P = JA = 4.69 * 10^{-4}


Part (c)

Time taken = \frac {Q}{Power} = 1.79*10^8 s = 6 years
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The time taken is ridiculous, which is why I'm not sure if that's right.

Also, heat is conducted away by radiation.
 
unscientific said:
n = \frac {PV}{RT} =\frac {(10^{-2})(3.3*10^{-4})}{(8.31)(293)} = 1.4 * 10^{-9}

According to the formula for ##k## in the statement of the problem, ##n## is the number of gas particles per unit volume. Looks like you're letting ##n## be the number of moles of gas in the flask.

Since the the molecular density is so low, we can effectively say the mean free path is the gap. λ ≈ 0.5 cm (Not sure if this is right, but if the molecule would crash into the other end of the fask before it hits the molecule, then the mean free path should definitely be in the order of magnitude of the gap, right?)

I'm not sure about what to do when λ is much greater than the gap. But your assumption seems to be reasonable. If you do assume that λ can be taken to be the thickness of the gap, then I think λ will cancel out by the time you calculate J.

Heat Capacity of air should be same order of magnitude as water;
C_{mol} ≈ 10^3 J K^{-1}

In the formula for ##k##, ##C_{mol}## is the heat capacity "of a molecule". Is that what your ##C_{mol}## represents? There is a well-known formula for the molar heat capacity at constant volume of an ideal diatomic gas. From that you can get the heat capacity per molecule.
 
TSny said:
According to the formula for ##k## in the statement of the problem, ##n## is the number of gas particles per unit volume. Looks like you're letting ##n## be the number of moles of gas in the flask.
I'm not sure about what to do when λ is much greater than the gap. But your assumption seems to be reasonable. If you do assume that λ can be taken to be the thickness of the gap, then I think λ will cancel out by the time you calculate J.
In the formula for ##k##, ##C_{mol}## is the heat capacity "of a molecule". Is that what your ##C_{mol}## represents? There is a well-known formula for the molar heat capacity at constant volume of an ideal diatomic gas. From that you can get the heat capacity per molecule.

the correct value of n should be n = 2.47*10^{18}

From the ideal gas law: at constant volume, For N molecules of gas, dQ = dU = N C_{mol} dT = \frac {5}{2} Nk dT So, C_v = \frac {5}{2}k = 3.45*10^{-23} Using these data along with <c> = 400 m/s, we obtain:
κ = 5.68*10^{-5}
Heat loss rate =7.14*10^{-4} J /s
time taken = \frac {energy}{heat loss rate} = \frac {mCΔT}{7.14*10^{-4}} = 3.7*10^{8} s

The time taken is astronomical!
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
the correct value of n should be = \frac {Vol.}{(1.4*10^{-9})(6*10^{23}}
The number density ##n## is the number of molecules per unit volume: ##n= N/V## where ##N## is the number of molecules and ##V## is the volume. From the ideal gas law ##PV = Nk_BT## you should be able to calculate ##n## from the pressure, temperature, and Boltzmann's constant ##k_B##.

From the ideal gas law: at constant volume, For N molecules of gas, dQ = dU = N C_{mol} dT = \frac {5}{2} Nk dT So, C_v = \frac {5}{2}k But this is per mol,

so per molecule = \frac {C_v}{6*10^{23}} = 3.4625*10^{-23}

The molar heat capacity at constant volume for an ideal diatomic gas is ##\frac{5}{2} R##. But that leads to the same result as you have for the heat capacity per molecule.

Using these data along with <c> = 400 m/s, we obtain:
κ = 9.17*10^{-42}

I think ##\kappa## should be on the order of 10-4 or 10-5 W/(m##\cdot##K)
 
TSny said:
The number density ##n## is the number of molecules per unit volume: ##n= N/V## where ##N## is the number of molecules and ##V## is the volume. From the ideal gas law ##PV = Nk_BT## you should be able to calculate ##n## from the pressure, temperature, and Boltzmann's constant ##k_B##.
The molar heat capacity at constant volume for an ideal diatomic gas is ##\frac{5}{2} R##. But that leads to the same result as you have for the heat capacity per molecule.
I think ##\kappa## should be on the order of 10-4 or 10-5 W/(m##\cdot##K)

I realized I calculated the wrong value of n. I have adjusted my answers above, and I get the following:

k = 5.68*10^{-5}, time = 3.7*10^{8} s
 
Last edited:
I get a similar result.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
50K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K