How Do You Calculate Thermal Conductivity Using Kinetic Theory?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating thermal conductivity using kinetic theory, specifically in the context of a vacuum flask. Participants are tasked with deriving an expression for thermal conductivity and estimating heat loss and cooling time for water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the formula for thermal conductivity, questioning the definitions of variables such as molecular density and heat capacity. There are discussions about the mean free path and its relation to the gap in the flask. Some participants express uncertainty about their calculations and assumptions regarding the values used for density and heat capacity.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the variables and their implications are being explored. Some participants have provided adjustments to their calculations and shared revised values for thermal conductivity and time estimates, indicating an ongoing evaluation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note discrepancies in calculated values, particularly regarding the number density of gas particles and the implications of using certain assumptions in their calculations. There is a recognition that heat loss may also involve factors beyond conduction, such as radiation.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Find an expression for thermal conductivity using kinetic theory.

Given a vacuum flask of these dimensions, find the heat loss per unit time.

Estimate the time taken for the water to cool down to 40 deg.

hvcqi8.png



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)
k = \frac {1}{3} C_{mol} n λ <c>

Part (b)

Estimate gap to be 0.5cm.

n = \frac {PV}{RT} =\frac {(10^{-2})(3.3*10^{-4})}{(8.31)(293)} = 1.4 * 10^{-9}

Since the the molecular density is so low, we can effectively say the mean free path is the gap. λ ≈ 0.5 cm (Not sure if this is right, but if the molecule would crash into the other end of the fask before it hits the molecule, then the mean free path should definitely be in the order of magnitude of the gap, right?)

Heat Capacity of air should be same order of magnitude as water;
C_{mol} ≈ 10^3 J K^{-1}

<c> ≈ 400 m s^{-1}

Estimate Temperature gradient ≈ ΔT/5cm) = 8000 K/m

Together, k ≈ 9.3*10^{-7} So, P = JA = 4.69 * 10^{-4}


Part (c)

Time taken = \frac {Q}{Power} = 1.79*10^8 s = 6 years
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The time taken is ridiculous, which is why I'm not sure if that's right.

Also, heat is conducted away by radiation.
 
unscientific said:
n = \frac {PV}{RT} =\frac {(10^{-2})(3.3*10^{-4})}{(8.31)(293)} = 1.4 * 10^{-9}

According to the formula for ##k## in the statement of the problem, ##n## is the number of gas particles per unit volume. Looks like you're letting ##n## be the number of moles of gas in the flask.

Since the the molecular density is so low, we can effectively say the mean free path is the gap. λ ≈ 0.5 cm (Not sure if this is right, but if the molecule would crash into the other end of the fask before it hits the molecule, then the mean free path should definitely be in the order of magnitude of the gap, right?)

I'm not sure about what to do when λ is much greater than the gap. But your assumption seems to be reasonable. If you do assume that λ can be taken to be the thickness of the gap, then I think λ will cancel out by the time you calculate J.

Heat Capacity of air should be same order of magnitude as water;
C_{mol} ≈ 10^3 J K^{-1}

In the formula for ##k##, ##C_{mol}## is the heat capacity "of a molecule". Is that what your ##C_{mol}## represents? There is a well-known formula for the molar heat capacity at constant volume of an ideal diatomic gas. From that you can get the heat capacity per molecule.
 
TSny said:
According to the formula for ##k## in the statement of the problem, ##n## is the number of gas particles per unit volume. Looks like you're letting ##n## be the number of moles of gas in the flask.
I'm not sure about what to do when λ is much greater than the gap. But your assumption seems to be reasonable. If you do assume that λ can be taken to be the thickness of the gap, then I think λ will cancel out by the time you calculate J.
In the formula for ##k##, ##C_{mol}## is the heat capacity "of a molecule". Is that what your ##C_{mol}## represents? There is a well-known formula for the molar heat capacity at constant volume of an ideal diatomic gas. From that you can get the heat capacity per molecule.

the correct value of n should be n = 2.47*10^{18}

From the ideal gas law: at constant volume, For N molecules of gas, dQ = dU = N C_{mol} dT = \frac {5}{2} Nk dT So, C_v = \frac {5}{2}k = 3.45*10^{-23} Using these data along with <c> = 400 m/s, we obtain:
κ = 5.68*10^{-5}
Heat loss rate =7.14*10^{-4} J /s
time taken = \frac {energy}{heat loss rate} = \frac {mCΔT}{7.14*10^{-4}} = 3.7*10^{8} s

The time taken is astronomical!
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
the correct value of n should be = \frac {Vol.}{(1.4*10^{-9})(6*10^{23}}
The number density ##n## is the number of molecules per unit volume: ##n= N/V## where ##N## is the number of molecules and ##V## is the volume. From the ideal gas law ##PV = Nk_BT## you should be able to calculate ##n## from the pressure, temperature, and Boltzmann's constant ##k_B##.

From the ideal gas law: at constant volume, For N molecules of gas, dQ = dU = N C_{mol} dT = \frac {5}{2} Nk dT So, C_v = \frac {5}{2}k But this is per mol,

so per molecule = \frac {C_v}{6*10^{23}} = 3.4625*10^{-23}

The molar heat capacity at constant volume for an ideal diatomic gas is ##\frac{5}{2} R##. But that leads to the same result as you have for the heat capacity per molecule.

Using these data along with <c> = 400 m/s, we obtain:
κ = 9.17*10^{-42}

I think ##\kappa## should be on the order of 10-4 or 10-5 W/(m##\cdot##K)
 
TSny said:
The number density ##n## is the number of molecules per unit volume: ##n= N/V## where ##N## is the number of molecules and ##V## is the volume. From the ideal gas law ##PV = Nk_BT## you should be able to calculate ##n## from the pressure, temperature, and Boltzmann's constant ##k_B##.
The molar heat capacity at constant volume for an ideal diatomic gas is ##\frac{5}{2} R##. But that leads to the same result as you have for the heat capacity per molecule.
I think ##\kappa## should be on the order of 10-4 or 10-5 W/(m##\cdot##K)

I realized I calculated the wrong value of n. I have adjusted my answers above, and I get the following:

k = 5.68*10^{-5}, time = 3.7*10^{8} s
 
Last edited:
I get a similar result.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
50K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K