How Do You Calculate Time Using an Acceleration Formula?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating time using an acceleration formula in the context of smoking cessation. The original poster seeks to determine the time until the next full unit of cigarettes is reached, using the equation d = v*t + (a*t^2)/2. After some back-and-forth, it is clarified that the equation is correct but needs to be adapted to isolate time properly. The final calculations suggest that, based on the provided variables, the time until the next cigarette is approximately 147 minutes, indicating a successful adjustment in the approach to the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying basic physics formulas to achieve accurate results.
kavius
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This is not strictly a physics problem, but I thought this would be the best place to ask...

I am having trouble calculating the time between events using an acceleration formula. I have the rate of deceleration, and would like to know the time until the next full unit occurs.
Code:
d =  1.0000000 cigarettes
v =  0.0069444 cig/min
a = -0.0000017 cig/min/min

d = v*t + (a*t*t)/2
Am I using the right formula? Can anyone see a way to isolate time? Maybe suggest a variation on the formula that would have the effect I am looking for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Time until the next 'full unit' occurs? What, you mean when Cigs=0?
 


You can solve for time by solving the equation quadratically.

Your equation is correct; d is actually (x-x0), the 'distance' you travel from start point to end point. Usually it's the number of meters travelled; for your problem it's the number of cigarettes.

You've got positive velocity and negative acceleration, so the shape of this curve (cigarettes on the vertical axis, minutes on the horizontal axis) is an inverted parabola, like the path of a football.

If you wish to know the value of t when you've reached '2 cigarettes', then you solve

(x-x0) = v0t + 0.5at^2

where

x = 2 cig
x0 = 1 cig (x0 is 'x-naught', or 'original x')
v0 = 0.006944 cig/min ('original v')
a = -0.0000017 cig/min/min
t = ?

1 = (0.006944)t - 0.000000085t^2

or

0.000000085t^2 - 0.006944t + 1 = 0

which is an equation of the same form as

2t^2 + 6t - 8 = 0

or

At^2 + Bt + C = 0

and the values of t for which it is true are found by the quadratic formula,

t = -B +/- sqrt(B^2 - 4AC)
----------------------------
2A

where +/- means (plus or minus),
sqrt means 'square root of', and
--------- means 'divided by'.

For my 2t^2 example, the answers are
t = 1 and t = 4.

For the numbers you gave, making sure to remember the minus sign in front of B, I get:

t = 144 minutes
and
t = 8022 minutes which is almost six days

Remember the curve is like a football flying through the air: it starts at one cigarette (or meter) high, arcs up through 2 cigs, and then higher still, peaks out at about 15 cigs high, and starts getting lower and lower, until it passes through the 2 cig mark (again) late in the fifth day

Which is the problem. When I read your question, I assumed that the quantity of cigarettes referred to the number smoked *so far*, a cumulative number. The negative acceleration would refer to a person who was *cutting back*, reducing the rate at which they smoke. This is fine; negative accelerations make sense for smoking. BUT negative velocities do not. I cannot be *undoing* the number of cigs I have smoked at so many cigs per minute; it's nonsense.

Unless you consider a celery stick, or a minute on a treadmill, or whatever, to be equal to one 'negative cigarette'...

anyway, I put the roots at 144 and 8022; that's when the level hits two cigs. If you want to know where it hits zero cigs, redo the problem with d = (x - x0) = (0 - 1) instead of (2 - 1) like I did above; you should get about 8310 min and -141 min. (Yes, a negative number; extend the curve I've described *backwards* past the t = 0 line and see that it hits the horizontal axis back there, too: it's again a nonsense solution, given by the math but ruled out by the physics (or common sense) of the problem.)

I've attached a screen capture of the graph I produced in Excel to help me solve this problem; had I had my TI-83 with me, I could've done it in a tenth of the time it took me this way.

Have I answered your question?

P
 

Attachments

  • cigs.jpg
    cigs.jpg
    10.1 KB · Views: 610
Thank-you.

The graph showed me exactly what the formula was doing and I realized that I am using the wrong formula. I should be doing a very basic acceleration formula and wasn't. I should have spent some more time doing some algebra and a little less time looking stuff up in books:

(I'm not a mathemetician or physicist so forgive poor variable names)
Code:
  Meaning of variables:
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  A  = acceleration
  d  = Change in position (distance)
  Vc = Velocity Change
  Vo = Velocity Original
  Ve = Velocity End
  t  = time

  Which Variables have:
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  A  = have
  d  = have
  Vc = don't
  Vo = have
  Ve = don't
  t  = ?

  We know these formulas:
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  Vc = Ve - Vo
  Ve^2 = Vo^2 + 2ad
  A  = Vc/t

  Therefore:
  ^^^^^^^^^
   a = Vc/t
   a = (Ve-Vo)/t
   a = ( (Vo^2 + 2ad)^(1/2) - Vo )/t
  at = ( (Vo^2 + 2ad)^(1/2) - Vo )
   t = ( (Vo^2 + 2ad)^(1/2) - Vo )/a

  Using some actual numbers I have:
  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  Vo = 0.0069444 cig/min (~25 per day)
   a = -0.0000017 cig/min/min (~60 days to 0 cig/min)
   d = 1.0000000 cig
   
   t = ( (Vo^2 + 2ad)^(1/2) - Vo )/a
   t = ( (0.0069444^2 + 2*(-0.0000017)*1.0000000)^(1/2) - 0.0069444 ) / (-0.0000017)
   t = ( (0.0000482 - 0.0000034)^(1/2) - 0.0069444 ) / (-0.0000017)
   t = ( (0.0000448)^(1/2) - 0.0069444 ) / (-0.0000017)
   t = ( 0.00669512 - 0.0069444 ) / (-0.0000017)
   t = (-0.00024927) / (-0.0000017)
   t = 146.63267827

Based on these numbers, the person attempting to reduce their smoking is allowed a cigarette in 147 minutes.
Thanks very much for the help.

Does the new math look correct?
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K