How Do You Construct Excited States in a Two-Boson Harmonic Oscillator?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on constructing excited states in a two-boson harmonic oscillator, specifically using the Hamiltonian ## \hat{H}=1/2 (\hat{p_1}^2+\hat{p_2}^2+\omega \hat{x_1}^2+\omega \hat{x_2}^2)##. The first excited state is correctly represented as ## \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|1,0\rangle + |0,1\rangle)##, acknowledging the indistinguishability of bosons. The second excited state is doubly degenerate and can be expressed as a linear combination of states ## |2,0\rangle, |0,2\rangle, ## and ## |1,1\rangle##, with the requirement that the states must be symmetric. The use of tensor product operators is essential for proper state construction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and harmonic oscillators.
  • Familiarity with bosonic statistics and indistinguishable particles.
  • Knowledge of tensor products in Hilbert spaces.
  • Proficiency in using ladder operators in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of tensor product spaces in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the properties of symmetric and antisymmetric wave functions.
  • Explore the concept of degeneracy in quantum states and its implications.
  • Investigate the role of ladder operators in constructing quantum states.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in quantum theory, and researchers working on bosonic systems will benefit from this discussion.

kuy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hy physics forum, I am doing an advanced qm course, but i still have some doubts about the correct formalism and so on..
so i have this problem of a one-dimensional harm. oscillator including 2 bosons.
the hamiltonian would thus be ## \hat{H}=1/2 (\hat{p_1}^2+\hat{p_2}^2+\omega \hat{x_1}^2+\omega \hat{x_2}^2)##
the ground state would be ## |0,0> ## and i have to build first and second excited states.
so my question is, would the first excited state just be ## 1/\sqrt{2} (|1,0> + |0,1>) ## or do i have to consider the pure states ##|1,0>## and ##|0,1>##too? and how would i write that properly with ladder operators?
thanks for your help
kuy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At first, ## \frac{1}{\sqrt 2} (|1.0\rangle+|0,1\rangle) ## is a pure state too!
And yes, this is the first excited state but each of ##|1,0\rangle## and ##|0,1\rangle## can't be because the particles are indistinguishable so you can't know which one is excited.
Each of the oscillators has its own Hilbert space. But when you write things in terms of ##|1,0\rangle## and ##|0,1\rangle##, it means you're considering the tensor product of the two Hilbert spaces and so your operators should be product operators too. So if you want to raise ## |0,0\rangle##, it means you should use the raising operator associated to the tensor product space which is ## \hat a^\dagger=\hat a_1^\dagger \otimes \hat I_2+\hat I_1 \otimes \hat a_2^\dagger ##(some may write it simply as ## \hat a^\dagger=\hat a_1^\dagger+\hat a_2^\dagger ## but you should be careful each operator acts on which Hilbert space.) , where ##\hat I_1 ## and ## \hat I_2 ## are identity operators in the two Hilbert spaces and ## \hat a_i^\dagger |0\rangle_i=C^{(i)}_+ |1\rangle_i ## and e.g. ## \hat I_1 \otimes \hat a_2^\dagger |0,0\rangle=C_+^{(2)} |0,1\rangle ##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuy
wow, this answer was far better than i hoped for :D thanks Shyan, that brought some clarity for me into undistinguishable particles
 
ok i have another question: if i make the second excited state with this tensor product raising operator, i get a linear combination of ## |2,0>##, ## |0,2>## and ## |1,1>##. Is that THE excited state? i thought ## 1/\sqrt{2} (|2,0> + |0,2>)## and ## |1,1>## would be separate states
 
kuy said:
Is that THE excited state?
Yes, that's it. Its symmetric so is proper for two bosons. Also its what the raising operator gives us.
But of course you can have a linear combination of ## |0,2\rangle \ ,|2,0\rangle \ , |1,1\rangle## that is orthogonal to the one you got but that would be an antisymmetric linear combination which is used for fermions. Also this is what you get if you raise an antisymmetric first excited state. Of course there may be other linear combinations but they won't be proper base states because we need either symmetric or antisymmetric wave-functions.
kuy said:
i thought 1/2√(|2,0>+|0,2>) 1/\sqrt{2} (|2,0> + |0,2>) and |1,1> |1,1> would be separate states
Why?
 
kuy said:
Is that THE excited state?
No. The second excited state is doubly degenerate.
 
Shyan said:
But of course you can have a linear combination of ## |0,2\rangle \ ,|2,0\rangle \ , |1,1\rangle## that is orthogonal to the one you got but that would be an antisymmetric linear combination which is used for fermions.
There is also a linear combination that is orthogonal and symmetric.
 
Shyan said:
Why?
if you meusure the energy of one particle in the ##|1,1>## state it would be different to one of the ##|2,0>## state, but the total energy is the same.
i was confused because i thought, if a energy level is degenerate, there have to be several states. so is a degenerate state always a linear combination of states with different properties?
DrClaude said:
There is also a linear combination that is orthogonal and symmetric.
or do i need 2 linear combinations for a doubly degenerate state?
 
Last edited:
You can use ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \left| 0, 2 \right\rangle + \left| 2, 0 \right\rangle \right)## and ##\left| 1, 1 \right\rangle## as the two orthogonal degenerate states.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K