How Do You Convert Seconds to Nanoseconds in Scientific Notation?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a time measurement from seconds to nanoseconds, specifically the expression ##1.66 \times 10^{-7} s##. Participants are exploring the thought process behind unit conversion in the context of scientific notation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of "ns" (nanoseconds) and the basic principles of unit conversion. There are attempts to clarify the conversion process and the significance of maintaining units during calculations. Some participants express confusion about specific numerical values and seek to understand the reasoning behind the conversion steps.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the conversion process and reflecting on their understanding of unit conversions. There is acknowledgment of errors in numerical representation, and some participants share personal experiences related to learning these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Some participants question the accuracy of the numerical values used in the conversion, indicating a potential misunderstanding or oversight in the calculations. The conversation also touches on the importance of including units in mathematical expressions to ensure clarity and correctness.

member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
How do you convert ##1.66 \times 10^{-7} s ## to ##ns##? I know the answer is ##166 ns = 160 \times 10^{-9} s## however what is the thought process?

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Callumnc1 said:
Homework Statement:: Please see below
Relevant Equations:: Please see below

How do you convert ##1.66 \times 10^-7 s ## to ##ns##? I know the answer is ##166 ns## however what is the thought process?

Many thanks!
Do you know what "ns" MEANS ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
phinds said:
Do you know what "ns" MEANS ?
Thanks for you reply @phinds! It means nanoseconds.
 
Callumnc1 said:
Thanks for you reply @phinds! It means nanoseconds.
And how do you express that in seconds?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
phinds said:
And how do you express that in seconds?
THanks for you reply @phinds! ## 1s = 1 \times 10^{-9} ns ##. Oh I think I know where you going with this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Callumnc1 said:
THanks for you reply @phinds! ## 1s = 1 \times 10^-9 ns ##. Oh I think I know where you going with this.
Sorry yeah it is just basic unit conversion.

##1.66 \times 10^{-7}s \times \frac {1ns} {1 \times10^{-9}s} = 166 ns ##
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right, except you have 1.6 where the original says 1.66
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
phinds said:
Right, except you have 1.6 where the original says 1.66
Oh whoops sorry @phinds! I'll fix that up.
 
Callumnc1 said:
Sorry yeah it is just basic unit conversion.

##1.66 \times 10^{-7} \times \frac {1ns} {1 \times10^{-9}s} = 166 ns ##
Yes, the thought process is to multiply the quantity you want to convert by "1", where the "1" is a fraction that is set up to cancel the old units with the denominator and result in the new units of the numerator. (the only thing you are missing in your equation that I quoted is to include the units of "s" in the first quantity, so that can be canceled by the denominator's "s" units in the multiplication)

I still remember my first semester "Introduction to Engineering" class, where a TA explained this trick to the class, and we all looked at each other like "Wow, I never thought of it like that before!". It's a simple trick, but very useful. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #10
berkeman said:
Yes, the thought process is to multiply the quantity you want to convert by "1", where the "1" is a fraction that is set up to cancel the old units with the denominator and result in the new units of the numerator. (the only thing you are missing in your equation that I quoted is to include the units of "s" in the first quantity, so that can be canceled by the denominator's "s" units in the multiplication)

I still remember my first semester "Introduction to Engineering" class, where a TA explained this trick to the class, and we all looked at each other like "Wow, I never thought of it like that before!". It's a simple trick, but very useful. :smile:
Thank you @berkeman - nice to see the thought process explained!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #11
Callumnc1 said:
THanks for you reply @phinds! ## 1s = 1 \times 10^{-9} ns ##. Oh I think I know where you going with this.

Looks like a sign error! (or a VERY strange second)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #12
Tom.G said:
Looks like a sign error! (or a VERY strange second)
Haha, yes @Tom.G , I'm still working on my LaTex :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
23K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K