How Do You Correctly Name Chemical Complexes?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the correct naming of various chemical complexes, highlighting the rules for nomenclature. For the complex [Cu(Cl4)]^2-, the name is tetrachlorocuprate (II) due to the negative charge and the presence of four chlorines. The complex Ag(NH3)2+ is named diamminesilver (I), reflecting the neutral ammine ligands and the positive silver ion. The compound Cu(NH3)4SO4 is referred to as monosulfatetetraamminecopper (II), with the sulfate and ammine ligands named in order. Lastly, Al(H2O)6Cl3 is called trichlorohexaaquoaluminum (III), incorporating both the negative chloride and neutral water ligands in the naming convention.
msdel
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I must name these substances

a) [Cu(Cl4)]^2-
b) Ag(NH3)2+
c) Cu(NH3)4SO4-
d) Al(H2))6Cl3


Now I have read the rules regarding naming these,
-Within the brackets the order- negative-charge, neutral and central.
-The number of each ligand is indicated by greek prefixes
-oxidation state of central ion as roman numeral
-if the complex species is negative, the name of the central atom ends with the suffix-ate.

As far as I am concerned I have come up with some rather creative names for these. I don't think I am doing it right, some help understanding this would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) tetrachlorocuprate (II)
b) diaminosilver (II) (I think...)
c) tetraaminocupricsulphate (spaces? hyphens?)
d) hexahydrogenaluminumchloride (?)

All just guesses :P
 
Nerro said:
d) hexahydrogenaluminumchloride (?)

All just guesses :P

No, d) Al(H2))6Cl3 should definitely be d) Al(H2O)6Cl3 which means I think it is just hydrated aluminium chloride AlCl3.6H2O (aluminium chloride hexahydrate). But if that's not the same thing, then I'd have to call Al(H2O)6Cl3 hexa-aquaaluminate chloride.

I think b) is ammono not amino. amino is something organic to me.

Shouldn't c) then be tetraammonocopper sulphate? (If the - sign is wrongfully there - Otherwise I don't know - tetraammonocopper(I) sulphate? Is this an ion?? Should we even call it monosulphate?)
I think tetraammonocupric sulphate would be the salt [Cu(NH3)4]2SO4.
 
Last edited:
Nomenclature

The names should be:

a) [Cu(Cl4)]2-
tetrachlorocuprate (II) ion
because the chlorine is a negative atom, so its named first, and there is no neutral atom so the central ion (the positive atom) is named second and since the charge difference between the four chlorines (4-) and the actual charge of the molecule is 2+, that means the copper has (II) in its name. The total charge is negative so you add "-ate" to the end, and you get cuprate (because you use the latin part of the name for this so it wouldn't be, say, ironate but ferrate).

b) Ag(NH3)2+
diamminesilver (II) ion
because there is no negative atom, and there is a neutral one ((NH3)2) and there is two of them, so ammine turns into diammine (and its spelled correctly, I checked). The next atom is the central one and so we name it silver, and since the charge of the molecule is 1+ and the charge of ammonia is 0, the charge of the silver molecule must be 1+, hence the silver (I) part. This is not a negative compound so there is no "-ate" added.

c) Cu(NH3)4SO4 (a neutral compound)
Monosulfatetetraamminecopper (II)
because we are supposed to name the stuff in brackets first, but since there are no brackets, we don't separate the names. First comes the negative ligand (one sulfate so its monosulfate), then the netural one (four ammonias so its tetraammine - having the two "a"s in the name beside each other doesn't matter), and then the central ion (the positive one - in this case, copper and since the neutral ligand has no charge, while there is a charge of 2- from the sulfate, that means it is followed by (II)).

d) Al(H20)6Cl3 (a neutral compound)
Trichlorohexaaquoaluminum (III)
because there are no brackets, we include the chlorine in the naming. First name the negative ligand (Cl3 so its trichloro) then the neutral ligand (six times H20 so its hexaaquo) and lastly the central ion (aluminum and since the charge of the compund is zero, the charge of the neutral ligand is zero, and the negative charge of three chlorine atoms is 3-, then aluminum is followed by (III) for a 3+ charge).
 
Last edited:
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top