How Do You Derive the Vector Identity Involving Divergence and Curl?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the vector identity involving divergence and curl, specifically the identity ∇(F . G) = (F . ∇)G + (G . ∇)F + F x (∇ x G) + G x (∇ x F). The user initially attempted to apply the BAC-CAB rule incorrectly, leading to confusion regarding the application of the del operator. The correct approach involves recognizing the distinction between vector operations and operator commutation, ultimately leading to the correct formulation of the identity using partial operators.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically divergence and curl.
  • Familiarity with the BAC-CAB rule in vector operations.
  • Knowledge of the del operator and its properties.
  • Basic principles of partial differentiation in multivariable calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of the del operator in vector calculus.
  • Learn about the BAC-CAB rule and its implications in vector identities.
  • Explore the concept of commutation in operator theory.
  • Review examples of vector identities in physics and engineering contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to understand the derivation of vector identities involving divergence and curl.

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The vectors F and G are arbitrary functions of position. Starting w/ the relations F x (∇ x G) and G x (∇ x F), obtain the identity

∇(F . G) = (F . ∇)G + (G . ∇)F + F x (∇ x G) + G x (∇ x F)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I started off with the relation F x (∇ x G) and used the BAC-CAB rule:

F x (∇ x G) = ∇(F . G) - (G . ∇)F

so ∇(F . G = (G . ∇)F + F x (∇ x G) which seems to contradict the identity I am supposed to get. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you can't apply the BAC-CAB rule here. That was derived for vectors by assuming that A X B = - B X A

However with the del operator del X A is a vector, but A X del is an operator...so there's a world of difference
 
The trouble is commuting an opperator adds a commutator term
In single variable calculus
D(uv)=uDv+vDu not uDv
we can use partial opperators to avoid this
let a opperant in {} be fixed
D(uv)=D({u}v)+D(u{v})={u}Dv+{v}Du=uDv+vDu

∇(F . G )=∇({F} . G )+∇(F . {G} )
∇({F} . G )=Fx(∇xG)+(F.∇)G
∇(F . {G} )=Gx(∇xF)+(G.∇)F
∇(F . G )=∇({F} . G )+∇(F . {G} )=Fx(∇xG)+(F.∇)G+Gx(∇xF)+(G.∇)F
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K