How Do You Determine the Concavity of a Parametric Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tnutty
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the concavity of a parametric equation defined by x = t - e^t and y = t + e^-t. Participants are analyzing the second derivative of the equation to understand its implications for concavity.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • One participant presents a second derivative they calculated, while others question its correctness and the steps taken to derive it. There is a focus on the implications of the second derivative for concavity.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the accuracy of the second derivative. Some suggest that the original poster may have made an error, while others offer insights into how to approach the problem of determining concavity.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is situated within a Calculus 2 context, which may influence the methods and assumptions being discussed. There is also mention of specific formatting and notation that could clarify the second derivative expression.

tnutty
Messages
324
Reaction score
1
I found a second derivative to the parametric equation :

x = t - e^t

y = t +e^-t


d^2y / dx^2 = e^-t+e^t-2 / (1-e^t)^3

I tried to do some tricks to it, but could not figure out its concavity, any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you found the wrong second derivative. What did you do to get that?
 
Its correct, because the online H.W said it is. Now it asks for its concavity. By the way this is Calc2, and not the concavity lesson on Calc1, if that helps any.
 
I agree with Hogger that your second derivative is wrong. I don't much care what the online HW said. The exponent on the expression in the denominator should be 2, not 3.
Also, you need parentheses surrounding the three terms in the numerator.

Without getting too elaborate with the LaTeX coding, your equation would be improved by looking like this:
d2y/dx2 = (et - 2 + e-t)/(1 - et)2

As it turns out, and fortunately for you, et - 2 + e-t can be factored. It's a perfect square trinomial. Having it factored makes it much easier to determine when d2y/dx2 is positive and when it's negative, which you'll need to determine concavity.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K