How Do You Determine the Direction of Friction on an Inclined Plane?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a box on an inclined plane, focusing on determining the direction of the friction force while maintaining equilibrium. The problem includes parameters such as mass, angle of inclination, angle of the string, and coefficient of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how to determine the direction of the friction force, considering different scenarios for its direction and the implications for equilibrium equations. Participants discuss the ambiguity in the problem statement regarding the friction force's direction and the tension in the string.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the friction force's direction and its relationship with tension. Some guidance has been offered regarding the range of possible tensions and the nature of the friction force, but no consensus has been reached on a definitive approach.

Contextual Notes

The problem statement lacks clarity on whether it seeks the minimum or maximum tension, leading to multiple interpretations of the friction force's role in maintaining equilibrium.

Alex126
Messages
84
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


It's Problem 3 of this page:
http://www.problemsphysics.com/forces/inclined_planes_problems.html

"A box of mass M = 10 Kg rests on a 35° inclined plane with the horizontal. A string is used to keep the box in equilibrium. The string makes an angle of 25 ° with the inclined plane. The coefficient of friction between the box and the inclined plane is 0.3."

Homework Equations


See link.

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have a problem understanding most of it, but there is one thing that left me thinking: how do we know, in advance (if we can know it), where the direction of the Friction force points?

The thing is, the solved problem has Friction force (Fs) pointing downwards (left), but as far as I can tell we could have just as rightfully assumed that it pointed upwards (right). In other words, on the X axis we could have two possible situations:

1. Like they did: Wx and Fs pointing left; Tx pointing right. So at the equilibrium it becomes (chosen +left, -right):
Wx + Fs - Tx = 0

2. Like I tried doing before checking their solution: Wx pointing left, Tx and Fs pointing right. Then we have (chosen +left, -right):
Wx - Fs - Tx = 0

I tried to think about it, but only managed to come up with two things. First, if we knew how much Wx and Tx are, then we can certainly know that, to keep the equilibrium, Fs must "assist" the "weaker" one of them, and therefore must be on the "weaker one's side". In other words, if Wx was +3, and Tx was -5, then Fs must be +2 (pointing left, like Wx); viceversa, if Wx was +5, and Tx was -3, then Fs must be -2 (pointing right).

But then I realized that we don't know Tx when this decision should be made (when setting the equations). So how do we make the decision?

The best I could come up with was this: do both methods, and then double-check if there are any contradictions in either one. If there are, discard that one.

So I went on and did my thing. Here's what I got by assuming that Fs pointed up.

Equilibrium on X (+left, -right):
+Wx - Fs - Tx = 0

Equilibrium on Y (+down, -up):
+Wy - N - Ty = 0
=> N = Wy - Ty
=> N = mg cos (35°) - T*sin (25°)
=> N = 80.36 - T*0.42

Back to the first equation:
+Wx - Fs - Tx = 0
=> Wx = Fs + Tx
=> mg sin (35°) = N*μ + T*cos (25°)
=> 56.27 = (80.36 - T*0.42) * 0.3 + T*0.91
=> (...) => T = 41 N

So Tx = 37.2 N

Now Fs:
+Wx - Fs - Tx = 0
=> Fs = Wx - Tx => Fs = +19 N

Alternatively:
N = Wy - Ty => N = 63 Newtons
So Fs = N*μ => Fs = +19 N again

So to recap the set of data I got:
W = 98.1
Wx = 56.3
Wy = 80.4

T = 41
Tx = 37.2
Ty = 17.3

Fs = 19
N = 63

X axis: Wx - Fs - Tx =? 0 => 56.3-19-37.2 = 0.1 => seems good (aside from approximations)
Y axis: Wy - N - Ty =? 0 => 80.4-63-17.3 = 0.1 => close enough again

Is there a contradiction somewhere that I'm missing, or are there actually two possible ways to solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Alex126 said:
Is there a contradiction somewhere that I'm missing, or are there actually two possible ways to solve this problem?
I think you are doing just fine: the book solution assumes Fs is pointing to the right, without any motivation.
You worked out an alternative assumption (I didn't check the numbers), which is fine too.

The weakness in the exercise statement is in the wording 'to keep the box in equilibrium' . I think any tension in the range from your value to the book value achieves that result. My point is that the friction coefficient helps find the maximum friction force, but the actual friction force can be anything between + and - ##\mu F_N## (in this configuration with different ##F_N## for each string tension ##T## ).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alex126
Alex126 said:
Is there a contradiction somewhere that I'm missing, or are there actually two possible ways to solve this problem?

@BvU is right, the tension can be anything between those both values. The problem does not specify if it asks the minimum or maximum tension. The minimum tension prevents the block sliding down the slope, and the box would not start to move upward along the slope till the tension is less than the maximum value.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Alex126 and BvU
Alright, thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
11K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K