How Do You Determine the Vector C in Orthogonal Line Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter oahsen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the vector C in orthogonal line equations, specifically finding the equation of line L that passes through point P0(1, 0, 2) and intersects line L1 orthogonally. The parametrization of line L1 is established as x=2t+1, y=3t-1, z=1, leading to the conclusion that the dot product of the direction vectors must equal zero for orthogonality. The analysis reveals that while the relationship between a, b, and c is not directly established, it is confirmed that c must equal 0 for the lines to intersect at z=1, resulting in the equation z=ct+2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector parametrization in three-dimensional space.
  • Knowledge of dot product and its application in determining orthogonality.
  • Familiarity with parametric equations of lines.
  • Basic algebra for solving equations involving parameters.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of vector parametrization in 3D geometry.
  • Learn about the properties of dot products and their use in vector analysis.
  • Explore the implications of line intersection in three-dimensional space.
  • Investigate the role of parameters in defining lines and their intersections.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying linear algebra, geometry enthusiasts, and anyone involved in solving problems related to vector equations and orthogonal lines.

oahsen
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



1) Find the equation of the line L which passes through the point P0(1, 0, 2) and
intersects the line L1 :(x − 1)/2=(y + 1)/3, z = 1 orthogonally.


The Attempt at a Solution



ı thought the line L1 as a parametrisation like x=2t+1;y=3t-1;z=1; then I took a vector parallel to L as ai+bj+ck. Then since the parallel vector of L1 (which is 2i+3j) orthogonal to ai+bj+ck then the dot product of them will 0. This lead 2a+3b=0; Therefore, I can think L as ; x=1+3bt/2 and y=bt. However, my question is how about c? how can ı relate it to a and b? Or is my approach to question is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
oahsen said:

Homework Statement



1) Find the equation of the line L which passes through the point P0(1, 0, 2) and
intersects the line L1 :(x − 1)/2=(y + 1)/3, z = 1 orthogonally.


The Attempt at a Solution



ı thought the line L1 as a parametrisation like x=2t+1;y=3t-1;z=1; then I took a vector parallel to L as ai+bj+ck. Then since the parallel vector of L1 (which is 2i+3j) orthogonal to ai+bj+ck then the dot product of them will 0. This lead 2a+3b=0; Therefore, I can think L as ; x=1+3bt/2 and y=bt. However, my question is how about c? how can ı relate it to a and b? Or is my approach to question is wrong?

That's perfectly valid but there is no way to relate c to a and b. First, notice that t is not "unique". Multiplying t by any number just changes the length of the parallel vector giving different parametric equations for the same line.

The line x= 1+ 3bt/2, y= bt, z= ct+ 1 is orthogonal to L1 for all b and c but does not necessarily intersect it. In order to intersect it, for some t, you must have (x-1)/2= 3bt/4= (y+1)/2= (bt+1)/3, z= ct+1= 1. From the last, either c= 0 or t= 0. If you put t= 0 into 3bt/4= (bt+1)/3 you get 1/3= 0 which is not true. Therefore, c= 0 and z= 1 for all t. Now, since t is arbitrary, assume your parmeterization is such that your new line intersects L1 when t= 1. Solve 3b/4= (b+1)/3 for b.
 
HallsofIvy said:
z= ct+ 1

it should z=ct+2 isn't it? Because the vector passes the point (1,0,2). And if it is so then ct+2=1 and ct=-1; then we could not fnd exact values to c or t . then how could we continue? ;
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K