How do you do this weird integral?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter somethingstra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Weird
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of the form \(\int \frac{f(x,y)}{x}dx\), where \(f(x,y)\) is an unspecified function of two variables, \(x\) and \(y\). Participants explore potential methods for solving this integral, considering various scenarios regarding the relationship between \(x\) and \(y\).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that integration by parts might be a method to solve the integral.
  • Several participants emphasize the necessity of knowing the specific form of \(f(x,y)\) to make any progress on the integral.
  • Another participant proposes that if \(x\) and \(y\) are independent, the integral can be computed by treating \(y\) as a constant.
  • There is a suggestion that if \(y\) is a function of \(x\), the approach to integration would vary and might require case-by-case analysis.
  • A participant humorously notes that if \(f(x,y) = 0\), the integral evaluates to zero, and if \(f(x,y) = 1\), the integral simplifies to \(\ln|x|\).
  • One participant mentions differentiating under the integral sign as a potential method, contingent on the nature of \(f(x,y)\).
  • Another participant draws a parallel to the ambiguity in solving \(f(x) = 0\), highlighting the dependence on the specific form of \(f\).
  • The original poster clarifies that \(f(x,y)\) was intended to represent an arbitrary function, seeking to understand the general form of the integral.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that without more information about \(f(x,y)\), it is challenging to provide a definitive method for solving the integral. Multiple viewpoints on how to approach the problem remain, reflecting the uncertainty surrounding the function's nature.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations due to the lack of specific information about \(f(x,y)\), which affects the applicability of various integration techniques. The participants acknowledge that different assumptions about the relationship between \(x\) and \(y\) could lead to different approaches.

somethingstra
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I came upon this strange integral:

\int \frac{f(x,y)}{x}dx

How would one attempt to solve this? Would integration by parts do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is f(x,y) ? Unless you have a more specific formula, there is not much you can do to compute or simplify the integral.
 
Like yyat said, unless we have more info about f(x,y) we can't really say anything about it.
 
Are yoiu going to tell us what f(x,y) is?
 
If x and y are independent variables, then just integrate normally with respect to x and treat y as a constant.

If y = g(x), then plug in.

If y is an implict function of x, some method of integration might make your life easier. This would be a lot easier to do on a case by case basis.
 
or if: f(x,y)=0 the integral is zero(0) or if

f(x,y)=1=> integral is ln|x|

(just messing around)!
 
... just for clarification, I was being serious. I think I just about listed all the cases. Did I miss one?
 
csprof2000 said:
... just for clarification, I was being serious. I think I just about listed all the cases. Did I miss one?

Excuse post #6. If you interpreted it as a joke to your post, it was not meant to be so.

I think you mentioned about all possible cases. The OP, might also consider differetiating under the integral sign as well, if applicable. But since there are no info whatsoever about the nature of f(x,y), then god help us.
 
No offense taken!

I agree that the problem is sort of vague. I mean, I could ask you how you solve the equation

f(x) = 0.

It... uh... sort of depends on, well, what f(x) is.
 
  • #10
Well, I meant f(x,y) to just be an arbitrary function of x and y. My question was meant to find out what the general form of the integral would be. Sorry for the confusion!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K