How Do You Find a Scalar Equation for a Plane Through Three Points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hollysmoke
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry Scalar
Click For Summary
To find a scalar equation for a plane through the points (3,2,3), (-4,1,2), and (-1,3,2), the initial approach involved using a vector equation with a position vector and directional vectors. The cross product of the directional vectors was calculated, but the final answer differed from the textbook due to an error in the multiplication of the scalar 's'. It was suggested that a more effective method is to use matrix algebra to solve the system of equations. Clarification was provided that an "equation" itself does not pass through points, as it is not a geometric object. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying vector and matrix methods in finding the equation of a plane.
Hollysmoke
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
The question is,

Find a scalar equation that passes through the points (3,2,3), (-4,1,2) and (-1,3,2).

What I did was put that into the vector equation form, using (3,2,3) as a position vector, resulting in:

r=(3,2,3) +t(-7,-1,-1) + s(-5,2,0)

Then I found the cross product of the directional vectors and went from there, but my final answer was different then the one in the textbook. Can someone tell me what I did wrong please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
s should be multiplied by (-3, 2, 0). Looks like you added instead of subtracted.

The better way to do this problem is to solve the system of equations, with matrix algebra if you have it.
 
I have no idea what it means for an "equation" to pass through three points. A line or a plane can pass through points but an equation is not a geometric object and has nothing to do with "points".
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K