How Do You Find the Electric Potential of a Uniformly Charged Rod?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at a point along the axis of a uniformly charged rod, specifically a plastic rod of length L = 11.8 cm and charge Q = 58.9 fC. The correct approach involves using the formula V = k ∫ (λ/(d+l)) dl, where λ = Q/L and k is Coulomb's constant. The user initially evaluated the indefinite integral incorrectly and was advised to apply definite limits for accurate results. The final electric potential, once calculated correctly, should not yield zero at the lower limit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and charge distribution
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's law and constants
  • Basic proficiency in using LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of electric potential due to continuous charge distributions
  • Practice definite integrals in calculus, focusing on limits of integration
  • Learn about the application of Coulomb's law in electrostatics
  • Explore the use of LaTeX for formatting mathematical equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric potential and charge distributions.

seraphimhouse
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The figure shows a thin plastic rod of length L = 11.8 cm and uniform positive charge Q = 58.9 fC lying on an x axis. With V = 0 at infinity, find the electric potential at point P1 on the axis, at distance d = 3.45 cm from one end of the rod.

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c24/qu_24_30.gif

Homework Equations



dq = [tex]\lambda[/tex]dx

[tex]\lambda[/tex] = Q/L

[tex]\int[/tex]dV = dq/r

The Attempt at a Solution



so after doing some substitutions i get

[tex]\int[/tex]dV = k [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\lambda[/tex]/ (d+L) dL

Simplifying it I get:

[tex]\int[/tex]dV = k[tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\int[/tex]1/(d+L) dL

After U-Sub I get:

k[tex]\lambda[/tex]ln(d+L)

Plugging all the values in I would get -0.008439 V. But it seems to be wrong. I'm sure it's somewhere around my integration that I messed up on. Any help would be great.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello seraphimhouse,

The limits of integration are important on this one. It seems you've evaluated the indefinite integral, but you need to evaluate the definite integral over the correct limits.

I'm guessing you are new to [tex]\LaTeX[/tex], so you can use my equation below as a template if you're unfamiliar on how to write the limits on the integral sign (if you'd like).

[tex]V = \int _{l=a} ^b \frac{k \lambda}{(d+l)}dl[/tex]

Of course, you need to choose appropriate values for a and b. And then evaluate the expression, once you have solved the indefinite integral (through substitution, like you've already done).

(Hint: the resulting expression, when evaluated with the bottom limit, is not zero! :wink:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K