How Do You Integrate Complex Functions with Fractional Powers?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the integration of complex functions involving fractional powers, specifically the integral \int_0^t(\gamma^{1/\kappa}-i\zeta{w}(1-t/s)_+^{H-1/2})^{\kappa}ds. The user seeks assistance in evaluating this integral, which is related to theorems from the papers "Fractional Tempered Stable Motion" and "Integrating Volatility Clustering into Exponential Levy Models." Key insights include the use of the characteristic function E[e^{i\zeta{X_t}}]=e^{\int_0^t \psi(\zeta G(t,s))ds} and the suggestion that the integral may not have a closed-form solution, with Wolfram Alpha indicating a hypergeometric function as a potential result.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fractional calculus and fractional powers
  • Familiarity with Lévy processes and their properties
  • Knowledge of characteristic functions in probability theory
  • Experience with computational tools like Mathematica for symbolic integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fractional calculus and its applications in probability theory
  • Learn about the characteristics and applications of tempered stable Lévy processes
  • Explore the use of hypergeometric functions in mathematical analysis
  • Investigate the integration techniques for convoluted subordinators in stochastic processes
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, and researchers in stochastic processes, particularly those working with fractional calculus and Lévy processes.

cernlife
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm struggling to work out how to integrate the following

[tex]\int_0^t(\gamma^{1/\kappa}-i\zeta{w}(1-t/s)_+^{H-1/2})^{\kappa}ds[/tex]

here (.)_+ denotes the positive part

if I did not have the ^(H-1/2) I can do it, alas it does have it! and so it stumps me on how to evaluate this integral.

any advice much appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sorry, it was meant to be (1-s/t)_+ that was a typo...

although I did enter it correctly into Mathematica...

basically what I am looking at is a theorem from the paper "fractional tempered stable motion" and also work from the paper "Integrating volatility clustering into exponential Levy models"which states that a convoluted subordinator is defined as

[tex]X_t = \int_0^t G(t,s)dL(s)[/tex]

which a theorem then states that if [tex]L(s)[/tex] is a tempered stable Levy process the [tex]X_t[/tex] is also tempered stable. where G(t.s) is some kernal of volterra type.

basically, the characteristic function of [tex]X_t[/tex] can then be computed by

[tex]E[e^{i\zeta{X_t}}]=e^{\int_0^t \psi(\zeta G(t,s))ds}[/tex]

where [tex]\psi(\zeta)[/tex] is the cumulant generating function, which for the tempered stable is defined as

[tex]\psi(\zeta)=\gamma\delta-\delta(\gamma^{1/\kappa}-2i\zeta)^{\kappa}[/tex]

now chosing the kernal to be adamped version of the fractional Holmgren-Liouville integral, i.e

[tex]G_H(t,s)=\frac{H+1/2}{E[L(1)]}\left(1-\frac{s}{t}\right)_+^{H-1/2}[/tex]

I am then left with trying to work out the following integral

[tex]\int_0^t \gamma\delta-\delta(\gamma^{1/\kappa}-2i(\zeta\frac{H+1/2}{E[L(1)]}\left(1-\frac{s}{t}\right)_+^{H-1/2}))^{\kappa}ds[/tex]

let [tex]w=\frac{H+1/2}{E[L(1)]}[/tex] and pull out what we can from the front of the integral, I then have

[tex]\gamma\delta{t}-\delta\int_0^t (\gamma^{1/\kappa}-2i\zeta{w}\left(1-\frac{s}{t}\right)_+^{H-1/2})^{\kappa}ds[/tex]

which is what I need to integrate, and is where I am not sure at all where to start...

any reply's, much appreciated.
 
By 'the positive part of f' do you mean 0 when f is negative and f when f is positive? In which case, you can drop the '+' entirely, and the put x=1-s/t. What you're left with will be something like
[tex]\int_0^1 \mathrm{d}x(1-iAx^\alpha)^\beta[/tex]
for which I don't think there'll be a nice closed form solution in general. Wolfram Alpha gives the answer as a hypergeometric function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K