How Do You Simplify the Integral of a Rational Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arman777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Rational
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying the integral of a rational function, specifically the integral of the form ∫dx/(x²-1)². Participants explore various methods for tackling this integral, including partial fraction decomposition and potential substitutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants attempt to decompose the integrand using partial fractions, expressing it in terms of simpler rational functions. Others question the complexity of the decomposition and whether it is necessary to pursue such a detailed approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing different methods and questioning the appropriateness of their approaches. Some suggest using trigonometric substitution as an alternative, while others express uncertainty about the complexity of the partial fraction method. There is no clear consensus on the best approach, but multiple lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is situated within a homework context that may impose specific techniques, such as partial fraction decomposition, which influences their approaches and discussions.

Arman777
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
2,163
Reaction score
191

Homework Statement


##∫\frac {dx}{(x^2-1)^2}##

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to divide ##\frac {1} {(x^2-1)^2}## as ##\frac {Ax+B} {(x^2-1)} +\frac {Cx^3+Dx^2+Ex+F} {(x^2-1)^2}##

but this looks so complex..I don't know how to do ? Maybe I can just left at simpler terms.But how can I decide it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Arman777 said:

Homework Statement


##∫\frac {dx}{(x^2-1)^2}##

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to divide ##\frac {1} {(x^2-1)^2}## as ##\frac {Ax+B} {(x^2-1)} +\frac {Cx^3+Dx^2+Ex+F} {(x^2-1)^2}##

but this looks so complex..I don't know how to do ? Maybe I can just left at simpler terms.But how can I decide it ?

One trick is to just use a single label for a polynomial:

##\frac {1} {(x^2-1)^2} = \frac {A(x)} {(x^2-1)} +\frac {B(x)} {(x^2-1)^2}##

And see what that leads to.
 
Is this specifically meant to be done by partial fractions? I would try a trig substitution first. Didn't do it so I don't know what happens.
 
PeroK said:
One trick is to just use a single label for a polynomial:

##\frac {1} {(x^2-1)^2} = \frac {A(x)} {(x^2-1)} +\frac {B(x)} {(x^2-1)^2}##

And see what that leads to.

Doesn't it lead to ##A(x) =0## and ##B(x) =1?##

However, the OP could certainly get
$$\frac{1}{x^2-1} = \frac{A}{x-1} + \frac{B}{x+1},$$
and thus get
$$\frac{1}{(x^2-1)^2} = \frac{A^2}{(x-1)^2}+ \frac{2 A B}{(x-1)(x+1)} + \frac{B^2}{(x+1)^2}, $$
then do something with that.
 
If the integral is meant to be evaluated using partial fractions, I would decompose the integrand like this:
##\frac 1 {(x^2-1)^2} = \frac 1 {(x - 1)^2(x + 1)^2} = \frac A {x - 1} +\frac B {(x - 1)^2}+ \frac C {x + 1} + \frac D {(x + 1)^2} ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Ray Vickson said:
Doesn't it lead to ##A(x) =0## and ##B(x) =1?##

There is another solution!
 
PeroK said:
There is another solution!

I get ##A(x)=0##
##B(x)-2A(x)=0##
##A(x)-B(x)=1##
whats the other solution ?

Mark44 said:
If the integral is meant to be evaluated using partial fractions, I would decompose the integrand like this:
##\frac 1 {(x^2-1)^2} = \frac 1 {(x - 1)^2(x + 1)^2} = \frac A {x - 1} +\frac B {(x - 1)^2}+ \frac C {x + 1} + \frac D {(x + 1)^2} ##
Is it make things easier ? (I am not sure..)
Ray Vickson said:
Doesn't it lead to ##A(x) =0## and ##B(x) =1?##

However, the OP could certainly get
$$\frac{1}{x^2-1} = \frac{A}{x-1} + \frac{B}{x+1},$$
and thus get
$$\frac{1}{(x^2-1)^2} = \frac{A^2}{(x-1)^2}+ \frac{2 A B}{(x-1)(x+1)} + \frac{B^2}{(x+1)^2}, $$
then do something with that.

can lead us yes but too long...
 
Arman777 said:
I get ##A(x)=0##
##B(x)-2A(x)=0##
##A(x)-B(x)=1##
whats the other solution ?

The other solution is fairly obvious, but it doesn't lead to a great improvement. You shouldn't have been so hasty to dismiss @Mark44's suggestion. I think your definition of what is "too complicated" is no longer appropriate for the level of mathematics you are dealing with. You shouldn't be baulking at only four coefficients.
 
PeroK said:
The other solution is fairly obvious, but it doesn't lead to a great improvement. You shouldn't have been so hasty to dismiss @Mark44's suggestion. I think your definition of what is "too complicated" is no longer appropriate for the level of mathematics you are dealing with. You shouldn't be baulking at only four coefficients.

Its not too hard to find a b c d but after that.We will left another ##(x-1)^2## and ##(x+1)^2## so I have to do all stuff again..Fine I ll try
 
  • #10
Arman777 said:
I get ##A(x)=0##
##B(x)-2A(x)=0##
##A(x)-B(x)=1##
whats the other solution ?Is it make things easier ? (I am not sure..)can lead us yes but too long...

Not too long at all. Sometimes things need considerable work, and there is no way to avoid doing it. Sometimes there are just no shortcuts.
 
  • #11
The answer is ##\frac {1} {4} ln (\frac {x+1} {x-1}) - \frac{x} {2(x^2-1)}+C##

I ll find soon
 
  • #12
Ray Vickson said:
Not too long at all. Sometimes things need considerable work, and there is no way to avoid doing it. Sometimes there are just no shortcuts.
yeah I know..But they shouldn't made such long questions
 
  • #13
Ray Vickson said:
Not too long at all. Sometimes things need considerable work, and there is no way to avoid doing it. Sometimes there are just no shortcuts.

Arman777 said:
yeah I know..But they shouldn't made such long questions
Real life isn't always about short questions.

You never told us whether you had to use a specific technique (such as by using partial fraction decomposition). Another approach that was already mentioned was trig substitution.
 
  • #14
Mark44 said:
Real life isn't always about short questions.

You never told us whether you had to use a specific technique (such as by using partial fraction decomposition). Another approach that was already mentioned was trig substitution.
You are right.The question is in the partial fraction section
 
  • #15
Arman777 said:
yeah I know..But they shouldn't made such long questions

"Nature laughs at the difficulties of integration." - Laplace
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Arman777
  • #16
I tried every method that we thought but nothing came up
 
  • #17
Arman777 said:
I tried every method that we thought but nothing came up

What partial fraction representation are you trying to use? Which parts yield "nothing"?
 
  • #18
Ray Vickson said:
What partial fraction representation are you trying to use? Which parts yield "nothing"?

Its too long to write down here :/.I can take photo maybe..Or I ll ask just my prof more simple
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K