How Do You Solve a Pulley System Problem with Frictionless Incline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vu10758
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a pulley system problem involving two masses connected over a frictionless incline. Participants are attempting to derive relationships between the tensions in the strings and the angular acceleration of the pulley, while also considering the forces acting on the masses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to write separate equations for each mass and the pulley, exploring the relationships between tensions and angular acceleration. There is a focus on expressing angular acceleration in terms of the masses' acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on setting up equations and checking the consistency of directions for the forces involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables, with some participants questioning their own calculations and seeking clarification on their approach.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of missing information regarding the relationship between forces acting on the pulley, as well as the need to ensure consistent directionality in the equations being formulated. Some participants express uncertainty about their results and seek validation of their work.

vu10758
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
Two masses are connected as shown at http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewImage&friendID=128765607&imageID=1423595691
It is problem 15

I drew my free body diagrams, but I can't figure out the relationship to write for the pulley since the incline is frictionless. I know that angular acceleration = (M1*g*sin(theta) - M2*g)R/ (I +M2R^2 +M1*R^2)

How do I get there though? I have to somehow get T1 and T2 out of the problem to write everything in terms of M1,M2,I,R,and theta. However, I am missing an important piece because I don't know the relationship between the forces for the pulley.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write three separate equations: one for M1, one for M2, and one for the pulley. The pulley "knows nothing" about the masses at the other end of the string. All it knows is there are strings with different tensions trying to rotate it in opposite directions.

Express the angular acceleration in terms of the acceleration of the masses. There will then be three unknowns: T1, T2 and acceleration. You can solve the three equations for the three unknowns.
 
Last edited:
Since I know that T1 is greater than T2, wouldn't the pulley have the relationship

T1-T2= Ia, where a is angular acceleration?
 
vu10758 said:
Since I know that T1 is greater than T2, wouldn't the pulley have the relationship

T1-T2= Ia, where a is angular acceleration?
Yes. And each mass will have an acceleration that depends in some way on a tension. The angular acceleration of the wheel and the linear acceleration of the masses are all related.
 
Thanks, I got it now.
 
vu10758 said:
Would you check my work? I got the wrong answer but it seems like my answer is very close

For M1)
x) T1-m1*g*sin(theta)=M1*a
y) N - M1*gcos(theta) <== This is not needed since there is no friction

For M2)

T2+M2*g + M2*a <== This should be
M2*g - T2 = M2*a

Pulley

T1 - T2 = I(alpa) <== This should be
T2 - T1 = I(alpha) It is very important to keep the directions consistent. M1 is moving up the plane, M2 is going down, and the wheel is rotating clockwise.

I know that a is alpha * r <== This is OK

M1*g*sin(theta) + M1*a + M2*a - M2*g = I(alpha)
M1*g*sin(theta) + M1*(r)(alpha) + M2*(r)*alpha - M2*g = I(alpha)
M1*g*sin(theta) -M2*g = I*(alpha) - M1*r(alpha) - M2*r*alpha
alpha = (M1*g*sin(theta) - M2*g)/(I-M1*r - M2*r)

This is wrong though. The correct answer is (M1*g*sin(theta) - M2*g)R/(I + M2*R^2 + M1*R^2)
See the annotations in the quote. Make the corrections and try the Algebra again.
 
OlderDan said:
See the annotations in the quote. Make the corrections and try the Algebra again.


Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
17K