How Do You Solve a Wave Equation Using Separation of Variables?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Precursor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a wave equation using the method of separation of variables, specifically defining the solution as u(x,t) = X(x)T(t). The transformation leads to the equation T''X = x²X''T + xX'T, which simplifies to T''/T = (x²X'' + xX')/X = -λ². The spatial problem is identified as x²X'' + xX' = -Xλ², with boundary conditions X(1) = 0 and X(e) = 0, indicating the need for non-trivial eigenvalues to satisfy the initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of eigenvalue problems in differential equations
  • Experience with logarithmic transformations in mathematical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in detail
  • Learn about eigenvalues and eigenfunctions in the context of PDEs
  • Explore boundary conditions and their implications on solutions
  • Investigate the use of logarithmic substitutions in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are dealing with wave equations and seeking to understand the separation of variables technique in solving PDEs.

Precursor
Messages
219
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

2nrq1x2.png
The attempt at a solution

I'm using the method of separation of variables by first defining the solution as u(x,t) =X(x)T(t)

Putting this back into the PDE I get: T''X = x^{2}X''T + xX'T

which is simplified to \frac{T''}{T} = \frac{x^{2}X'' + xX'}{X} = -\lambda^{2}

The spatial problem is then: x^{2}X'' + xX' = -X\lambda^{2}

Is this correct so far? How do I continue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. You proceed, of course, by solving that equation, together with the boundary conditions X(1)= 0, X(e)= 0.

(Those boundary conditions follow from u(t, 1)= T(t)X(1)= 0 and u(t, e)= T(t)X(e)= 0. If T(t) is not identically 0, which would not satisfy the initial conditions, then X(1)= X(e)= 0.)

(An obvious solution is the trivial X(x)= 0. But then you could not satisfy the initial conditions. \lambda must be such that the equation has non-trivial solutions- i.e. eigenvalues.)
 
Precursor said:
Homework Statement

2nrq1x2.png



The attempt at a solution

I'm using the method of separation of variables by first defining the solution as u(x,t) =X(x)T(t)

Putting this back into the PDE I get: T''X = x^{2}X''T + xX'T

which is simplified to \frac{T''}{T} = \frac{x^{2}X'' + xX'}{X} = -\lambda^{2}

The spatial problem is then: x^{2}X'' + xX' = -X\lambda^{2}

Is this correct so far? How do I continue?

Looking at the boundary conditions, the substitution X(x) = Z(\log (x)) looks helpful.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K