MHB How does 12 + j16 become 20 ∠53.1° in impedance calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter portcharlotte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impedance
portcharlotte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good morning,

I was reviewing a problem in my book regarding Impedance. I have a question. For the impedance -Z they got 20 ∠53.1° degrees How did they go from 12 + j16 to 20 ∠53.1°. Thanks

View attachment 8827
 

Attachments

  • 12.11 Text Book Need Help.JPG
    12.11 Text Book Need Help.JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 103
Mathematics news on Phys.org
portcharlotte said:
Good morning,

I was reviewing a problem in my book regarding Impedance. I have a question. For the impedance -Z they got 20 ∠53.1° degrees How did they go from 12 + j16 to 20 ∠53.1°. Thanks

Hi portcharlotte, welcome to MHB! ;)

Every imaginary number has a cartesian representation and a polar representation.
The relation between $x+jy$ and $r∠\theta$ is given by $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $\theta=\arctan\frac yx$.
That is, unless $x\le 0$ in which case we have to select the appropriate $\theta$ in the unit circle, as it is out of range of $\arctan$.

In this case we have $x=12$ and $y=16$. Therefore $r=\sqrt{12^2+16^2}=20$ and $\theta=\arctan\frac{16}{12}\approx 53.1°$
 
Thank you so much Professor.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top