How Does a Ball's Mass Affect Its Final Velocity After Colliding with a Plank?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeNewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between a ball and a plank on a frictionless surface, focusing on how the mass of the ball affects its final velocity after the collision. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically conservation of momentum and energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of mass ratios on the direction of the ball's final velocity, with some questioning the initial assumptions about the ball's motion post-collision. There are also considerations regarding the validity of certain solutions, particularly the case where the final velocity equals the initial velocity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the collision dynamics. Some guidance has been provided regarding the importance of not assuming the direction of the final velocity at the outset, suggesting a more open approach to the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the collision's outcome may vary significantly based on the mass ratio of the ball to the plank, and there are references to specific conditions under which the ball may bounce back or continue moving forward.

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,850
Reaction score
553

Homework Statement


A plank of length 2l and mass M lies on a friction-less plane. A ball of mass m and speed v_{0} strikes its end as shown. Find the final velocity v_{f} of the ball assuming mechanical energy is conserved and v_{f} is along the original line of motion. Ans. clue. For m = M, v_{f} = \frac{3}{5}v_{0}.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so because \sum F = \partial _{t}P = 0 and \sum \tau = \partial _{t}L = 0 (internal collision forces cancel as per Newton's 3rd law) we can use conservation of both linear and angular momentum. We are free to choose a viable coordinate system so any coordinate system with its origin fixed on the line of motion of the point particle of mass m will do the trick. In this frame, L_{0} = 0 because the plank is initially at rest and the particle's momentum is directed parallel to its position vector with respect to the origin in this frame. Since the question states that even after the collision the particle moves along the same line of motion, the angular momentum after comes entirely from the plank which is now rotating as well as translating in some form so L_{f} = I_{com}\omega(-\hat{k}) + lMV(\hat{k}) = (lMV - \frac{1}{3}Ml^{2}\omega)\hat{k} = 0 and we get that \omega = \frac{3V}{l}. We also have conservation of linear momentum and here is where I got confused. I'll do as I did on my note book and state my concern after: mv_{0} = -mv_{f} + MV so V^{2} = \frac{m^{2}}{M^{2}}(v_{0} + v_{f})^{2} and using this together with the expression for the angular velocity of the plank after the collision I was able to simply the conservation of mechanical energy equation, \frac{1}{2}mv_{0}^{2} = \frac{1}{2}mv_{f}^{2} + \frac{1}{2}MV^{2} + \frac{1}{2}I_{com}w^{2}, down to (1 + \frac{4m}{M})v_{f}^{2} + 8\frac{m}{M}v_{0}v_{f} + (\frac{4m}{M} - 1)v_{0}^{2} = 0 which gives the solutions v_{f} = -{v_{0}\frac{(\frac{4m}{M} \pm 1)}{(\frac{4m}{M} + 1)}}. If I use m = M for the Ans. clue. then I get v_{f} = -\frac{3}{5}v_{0} or v_{f} = -v_{0}. My questions are these: I assumed at the beginning that the point particle would shoot backwards after colliding with the plank hence the negative sign but if I assume it keeps going in the same direction and do everything up till now the exact same way I get the right answer v_{f} = \frac{3}{5}v_{0} but it makes intuitive sense to me that the particle would bounce back after hitting the plank thus causing the plank to rotate, and translate in the opposite direction; why would the particle keep moving forward? Secondly, there is the case v0 = vf and I don't see a justification for why this solution can be eliminated other than the fact that it would be a trivial solution where nothing at all happens to the plank. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • kleppner 6.37.jpg
    kleppner 6.37.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 775
Physics news on Phys.org
WannabeNewton said:
I assumed at the beginning that the point particle would shoot backwards after colliding with the plank hence the negative sign but if I assume it keeps going in the same direction and do everything up till now the exact same way I get the right answer v_{f} = \frac{3}{5}v_{0} but it makes intuitive sense to me that the particle would bounce back after hitting the plank thus causing the plank to rotate, and translate in the opposite direction; why would the particle keep moving forward? Secondly, there is the case v0 = vf and I don't see a justification for why this solution can be eliminated other than the fact that it would be a trivial solution where nothing at all happens to the plank. Thank you.

Whether the colliding ball bounces back or moves in the original direction depends on the ratio of masses. Remember the case of two colliding point masses. When one is in rest, the lighter incoming ball bounces back, one with equal mass stops and a heavier one moves in the original direction. The masses are equal here. in case m/M<1/4 the ball would bounce back.

You get vf=vo a possible solution. You got vf from the conservation equations and they are also valid when nothing happens: the ball does not touch the plank.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Whether the colliding ball bounces back or moves in the original direction depends on the ratio of masses. Remember the case of two colliding point masses. When one is in rest, the lighter incoming ball bounces back, one with equal mass stops and a heavier one moves in the original direction. The masses are equal here. in case m/M<1/4 the ball would bounce back.

You get vf=vo a possible solution. You got vf from the conservation equations and they are also valid when nothing happens: the ball does not touch the plank.

ehild

Thank you. So when I start I should not assume anything about the direction of the final velocity and that way its sign will come naturally out of what I choose for M,m?
 
WannabeNewton said:
Thank you. So when I start I should not assume anything about the direction of the final velocity and that way its sign will come naturally out of what I choose for M,m?

Yes. Decide what direction you choose as positive, and do not assume anything about the direction of the unknown velocity. It will come out.

ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K