How Does a Fly Navigate Between Capacitor Plates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the navigation of a fly between capacitor plates, specifically analyzing equipotential lines and surfaces. Participants clarify that the equipotential surfaces are topologically spherical and have a radial symmetry due to the disc shape of the plates. The potential at a distance from the center of the capacitor is derived using the formula for electric potential of a charged disk, with approximations made for distances much smaller than the radius of the plates. The final expression for the potential at a point εd/2 from the center is established as V = (σd)/(2ε₀).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials in capacitor systems
  • Familiarity with the concept of equipotential lines and surfaces
  • Knowledge of calculus for setting up integrals related to electric potential
  • Basic physics of charged discs and their symmetry properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential for charged disks using calculus
  • Learn about the properties of equipotential surfaces in electrostatics
  • Explore the implications of radial symmetry in electric fields
  • Investigate the approximation methods for electric fields and potentials in capacitor systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism, as well as anyone interested in understanding the behavior of charged systems and equipotential surfaces.

  • #31
ehild said:
Very far away from the capacitor the plates are small with respect to the distance so they can be treated as point charges. Determine how the potential depends on the distance from the central point.

The expression for the potential outside is mentioned above by haruspex.
For large x, the expression approximates to:
V=2\pi k \sigma d
\Rightarrow V=\frac{\sigma d}{2 \epsilon_0}

Have I approximated the expression correctly?

ehild said:
See picture. The fly starts at P and reaches P' on the equipotential.
By the way, you had the electric field between the plates correctly in post #21. What is the potential at the point εd/2 distance from the centre, if you take the zero of the potential at the central point? You can even omit the d/R term.

So the electric field in the middle region can be approximated to ##\displaystyle \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##?

The potential at the point εd/2 distance from the centre is ##\displaystyle \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}\cdot \frac{d\epsilon}{2}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Pranav-Arora said:
The expression for the potential outside is mentioned above by haruspex.
For large x, the expression approximates to:
V=2\pi k \sigma d
\Rightarrow V=\frac{\sigma d}{2 \epsilon_0}

Have I approximated the expression correctly?

No, it must depend (decrease) with the distance from the capacitor.

Pranav-Arora said:
So the electric field in the middle region can be approximated to ##\displaystyle \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}##?

The potential at the point εd/2 distance from the centre is ##\displaystyle \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}\cdot \frac{d\epsilon}{2}##

That is correct.


ehild
 
  • #33
ehild said:
No, it must depend (decrease) with the distance from the capacitor.

I am not sure how would I approximate the following surd. :confused:
\sqrt{\left(x-\frac{d}{2}\right)^2+R^2}=\sqrt{x^2+\frac{d^2}{4}-xd+R^2}

I guess I can drop the d^2/4 term but what should I do after that?
 
  • #34
\sqrt{x^2+\frac{d^2}{4}-xd+R^2}=\sqrt{x^2+R^2+<br /> d^2/4}\sqrt{1-\frac{xd}{x^2+R^2+<br /> d^2/4}}...

ehild
 
  • #35
ehild said:
\sqrt{x^2+\frac{d^2}{4}-xd+R^2}=\sqrt{x^2+R^2+<br /> d^2/4}\sqrt{1-\frac{xd}{x^2+R^2+<br /> d^2/4}}...

ehild

\sqrt{x^2+R^2+d^2/4}\sqrt{1-\frac{xd}{x^2+R^2+d^2/4}}=\sqrt{x^2+R^2+d^2/4}\left(1-\frac{xd}{2(x^2+R^2+d^2/4)}\right)

Similarly, the other surd can be simplified.
I end up with the following expression for the potential:
V=2\pi k \sigma d \left(1-\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+R^2+d^2/4}}\right)

Is this correct?

EDIT: Looks like I have got the right answer. Equating the above expression for ##\frac{\sigma d \epsilon}{2 \epsilon_0}## and plugging in the values of d and R, I get the right answer which is 21.215.

Thanks a lot for the help everyone! :smile:
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Pranav-Arora said:
EDIT: Looks like I have got the right answer. Equating the above expression for ##\frac{\sigma d \epsilon}{2 \epsilon_0}## and plugging in the values of d and R, I get the right answer which is 21.215.

Thanks a lot for the help everyone! :smile:

Very good!

Try also the method I outlined in #30. Just for fun :)

ehild
 
  • #37
ehild said:
Try also the method I outlined in #30. Just for fun :)

That's the method I used to solve the problem. Are you talking about #29?
 
  • #38
Pranav-Arora said:
That's the method I used to solve the problem. Are you talking about #29?

No it was #30. Approximating the field far away as that of two points charges.


ehild
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
671
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K