How Does a Heat Engine's Efficiency Impact Its Exhaust Heat Rate?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The heat engine discussed operates between 40°C and 380°C, with a theoretical Carnot efficiency calculated at 52%. Given that the engine's actual efficiency is 60% of the Carnot efficiency, it results in an effective efficiency of 31%. With an absorbed heat rate of 60 kW, the engine exhausts heat at a rate of 41.3 kW (or 41.3 kJ/s), confirming the calculations performed are accurate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Carnot efficiency and its formula (e = 1 - TL/TH)
  • Knowledge of heat transfer principles and energy conservation
  • Familiarity with unit conversions, specifically Celsius to Kelvin
  • Basic algebra for solving equations related to efficiency
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of real-world efficiencies in thermal systems
  • Explore advanced heat engine designs and their performance metrics
  • Learn about the impact of temperature gradients on engine efficiency
  • Investigate methods to improve the efficiency of heat engines
USEFUL FOR

Students in thermodynamics, engineers designing heat engines, and anyone interested in optimizing thermal efficiency in mechanical systems.

mlostrac
Messages
83
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A heat engine operates between 40°C and 380°C. Being a real engine, its
efficiency is only 60% of that theoretically possible for a Carnot engine at these
temperatures. If it absorbs heat at a rate of 60 kW, at what rate does it exhaust
heat?



Homework Equations



e = 1 - TL/TH --> Carnot Efficiency
e = 1 - QL/QH --> Efficiency


The Attempt at a Solution



1) First I changed the temperatures to Kelvins, then I calculated the Carnot efficiency:

e = 1 - (313/657)
= 1 - 0.48
= 0.52

2) Then I determined the actual efficiency to be:

0.52 x 0.60 = 0.31 or 31%

3) Finally I plugged in the efficiency in 2 to the 2nd equation above:

0.31 = 1 - (QL/60 kW)
60(0.31) = 60 - QL
18.72 = 60 - QL
QL = 41.3 kW

So therefore the engine exhausts heat at 41.3 kW or 41.3 kJ/s. I think I did this right, but I'm the type of guy who always manages to forget something or other.

Does this look right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes that looks right to me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K