How does a non-linear Schrodinger equation implies non-unitary evolution?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
IRobot
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I several times heard that one way to describe the collapse of the wave-function is to add non linearities in the Schrödinger equation (I know that this approaches are not convincing but that's not my point), however, I don't see why a non linear SE would imply loss of unitarity? As long as the Hamiltonian is hermitean, or real if you see it as a function of [itex]\psi[/itex] and [itex]\psi^*[/itex], we can derive an equation of probability conservation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you call, loss of unitarity, to the breakdown of the superposition ?
------
and apart there are non hermitian hamiltonians that are unitary.
Mostafazadeh, Bender.
 
Well, I would call loss of unitarity any loss of unitarity, but as I heard of using non-linearities to describe wave-function collapse, and the breakdown of a superposition is non unitary evolution, I'd say maybe =)