How Does a Polynomial Transformation Affect Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ptolema
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of eigenvectors and eigenvalues in the context of polynomial transformations applied to linear operators on vector spaces. The original poster presents a statement to prove regarding the relationship between a polynomial of a linear operator and its eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of substituting eigenvalues into polynomial expressions and question the validity of certain algebraic manipulations. Some suggest using induction to prove relationships, while others challenge the correctness of previous assertions regarding the operations on eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants presenting differing viewpoints on the validity of the original statement and the methods used to approach the problem. There is no clear consensus, as some participants defend their interpretations while others raise counterarguments.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of polynomial transformations and their effects on eigenvectors and eigenvalues, particularly in the absence of specific theorems or established proofs. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions and interpretations that are being critically examined.

ptolema
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let T be a linear operator (T: V-->V) on a vector space V over the field F, and let g(t) be a polynomial with coefficients from F. Prove that if x is an eigenvector of T with corresponding eigenvalue λ, then g(T)(x) = g(λ)x. That is, x is an eigenvector of g(T) with corresponding eigenvalue g(λ).

Homework Equations



T(x)=λx

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried substituting λx directly into g, but that gave me an answer that I couldn't easily factor x out of to get g(T)(x) = g(λ)x. I don't know if there is a theorem regarding this, but I've hit a wall. Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how doing what you say wouldn't work directly.

Write g(x) as [itex]g(x)= a_nx^n+ a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_1x+ a_0[/itex]. Then, for any vector x, [itex]g(T)v= a_nT^nx+ a_{n-1}T^{n-1}x+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_1Tx+ a_0x[/itex]

The crucial point is that, because x is an eigenvector of T with eigenvalue [itex]\lambda[/itex], [itex]Tx= \lambda x[/itex], [itex]T^2x= T(Tx)= T(\lambda x)= \lambda T(x)= \lambda(\lambda x)= \lambda^2 x[/itex], to [itex]T^nx= \lambda^n x[/itex]. To prove that rigorously, use induction on n.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, the previous answer was completely incorrect. First, (T(x))^2 is the quantity T(x) squared, which is not, in general, equal to T(T(x)), which is the quantity T(x) evaluated in T. Unless T is the squaring function, (T(x))^2 doesn't equal T^2(x).

Unfortunately, as you have it written, there is not a proof for such an equality, as it does not hold. consider g=x^2+1. Then g(T(x))=(T(x))^2+1= a^2x^2+1, which is obviously not equal to (a^2+1)x. (Where a is the eigenvalue to x). Even if we consider the notion given in the last post, the +1 term throws off the calculation, because g(a)x=xa^2+x, and g(T(x))=xa^2+1.
 
Nah, HallsofIvy has it right. Let A be a matrix representation of T with respect to some basis. Then

g(A) = a_n A^n + ... + a_1 A + a_0 I.

It's the same sort of operator/matrix/polynomial idea as in the Cayley-Hamilton theorem. (EDIT: I am NOT saying that theorem is relevant here, it's just the same sort of "put matrix into a polynomial" idea.) Then if x and c an eigenvector and eigenvalue of A, we are to prove

g(A)x = g(c) x.
 
halez12 said:
No, the previous answer was completely incorrect. First, (T(x))^2 is the quantity T(x) squared
No, it's not. We are working in a general vector space and multiplication (and so squaring) is not even defined. The only thing "[itex]T^2(x)[/itex]" (I never wrote "[itex](T(x))^2[/itex]") could mean is T(T(x)).

, which is not, in general, equal to T(T(x)), which is the quantity T(x) evaluated in T. Unless T is the squaring function, (T(x))^2 doesn't equal T^2(x).

Unfortunately, as you have it written, there is not a proof for such an equality, as it does not hold. consider g=x^2+1. Then g(T(x))=(T(x))^2+1= a^2x^2+1, which is obviously not equal to (a^2+1)x. (Where a is the eigenvalue to x). Even if we consider the notion given in the last post, the +1 term throws off the calculation, because g(a)x=xa^2+x, and g(T(x))=xa^2+1.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
15K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K