How Does a Spring's Compression Relate to Work and Energy in Physics Problems?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving springs, energy, and friction. The scenario describes a mass compressing a spring, moving across a frictional surface, and then compressing a second spring. Participants explore the relationships between potential energy, kinetic energy, and work done by non-conservative forces.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations of potential energy and work done, with some expressing confusion about their results. Questions arise regarding the setup of the problem, particularly about the relationship between the two springs and the role of friction. There is also a focus on the correct conversion of units and the interpretation of energy loss due to friction.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with participants providing insights into energy conservation and the equations relevant to non-conservative forces. Some have shared their calculations and reasoning, while others have offered clarifications and corrections. There is a sense of progress as participants refine their understanding of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential gaps in their understanding of the concepts involved, particularly regarding work done by non-conservative forces and energy conservation principles. There is also mention of the need for accurate unit conversions, which may affect the calculations.

Mathieu
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A spring of constant 18 N/cm is compressed a distance 7cm by a 0.5 kg mass, then released. It skids over a frictional surface of length 1.6m with coefficient of friction 0.17, then compresses the second spring of constant 5 N/cm. the acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2


Homework Equations


PE=1/2kx^2 --- potential energy = 1/2 kinetic length ^2
KE=1/2mv^2 --- kinetic energy = 1/2 mass velocity ^2
W=Fd ---work = force distance



The Attempt at a Solution


i converted all the cm to m.. then plugged them into EP=1/2kx^2.. so
PE=1/2(.18)(0.07)^2
PE=0.000441J
but this already didn't look right, however, I still used it in W=Fd.
W = 0.000441*1.6
W = 0.000705600
now this REALLY isn't looking right, and I really have NO idea what I'm doing, except getting random numbers. As much as I love physics (really, I use to want to be a physicist) i have never really understood what I'm doing as far as these harder problems go. If anyone could help me, that would be amazing. thanks!


Mathieu
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mathieu said:

Homework Statement


A spring of constant 18 N/cm is compressed a distance 7cm by a 0.5 kg mass, then released. It skids over a frictional surface of length 1.6m with coefficient of friction 0.17, then compresses the second spring of constant 5 N/cm. the acceleration of gravity is 9.8m/s^2

Homework Equations


PE=1/2kx^2 --- potential energy = 1/2 kinetic length ^2
KE=1/2mv^2 --- kinetic energy = 1/2 mass velocity ^2
W=Fd ---work = force distance

The Attempt at a Solution


i converted all the cm to m.. then plugged them into EP=1/2kx^2.. so
PE=1/2(.18)(0.07)^2
PE=0.000441J
but this already didn't look right, however, I still used it in W=Fd.
W = 0.000441*1.6
W = 0.000705600
now this REALLY isn't looking right, and I really have NO idea what I'm doing, except getting random numbers. As much as I love physics (really, I use to want to be a physicist) i have never really understood what I'm doing as far as these harder problems go. If anyone could help me, that would be amazing. thanks!Mathieu

Are you solving for energy lost by friction from the initial position (first compressed spring) to the final position (second compressed spring)? Is the mass connected to the two springs, or is the mass launched off the first spring and into the second spring? In you're attempt at a solution, you seem to substitute PE for F in the work equation. When dealing with energy, I think you use:
W = [tex]\Delta[/tex]KE = -[tex]\Delta[/tex]PE = [tex]\int[/tex][tex]\vec{F}[/tex] [tex]\bullet[/tex] d[tex]\vec{r}[/tex], because [tex]\vec{F_{spring}}[/tex]= -k[tex]\vec{x}[/tex]. If the mass is launched, then the initial spring energy is converted into an initial kinetic energy of the mass (-[tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]SE_{i}[/tex] = [tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]KE_{i}[/tex]). Some of that initial kinetic energy is lost as frictional energy, and the mass collides with the second spring with a final kinetic energy ([tex]KE_{i}[/tex] - FE = [tex]KE_{f}[/tex]). The final kinetic energy is converted into spring energy, and the mass stops (-[tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]KE_{f}[/tex]= [tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]SE_{f}[/tex]). I'm not sure what you're solving for, but I think this is how you would solve for energy lost. Feel free to correct me.
 
I'm sorry..i didn't post the actual question...i'm so dumb haha its:

How far will the second spring compress in order to bring the mass to a stop? answer in units of cm.

and the mass isn't connected, the first spring launches it across the surface to the second spring
 
Hi Mathieu, welcome to PF.
Check your conversions. 1 cm = 0.01 m.
Then 18 N/cm = ... N/m?
 
0.18 N/m...correct?
 
The spring used in the problem requires 18 N force to stretch 1 cm. How much force is needed to stretch the same spring through 1 m?
 
ki = 1800 N/m
kf = 500 N/m
xi = 0.07 m
m = 0.5 kg
r = 1.6 m
[tex]\mu_{k}[/tex] = 0.17
g = 9.81 m/s2

-[tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]SE_{i}[/tex] = [tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]KE_{i}[/tex]
-0.5kixi = 0.5mvi^2

[tex]KE_{i}[/tex] - FE = [tex]KE_{f}[/tex]
0.5mvi^2 - [tex]\mu_{k}[/tex]mgr = 0.5mvf^2

-[tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]KE_{f}[/tex]= [tex]\Delta[/tex][tex]SE_{f}[/tex]
-0.5mvf^2 = 0.5kfxf

Substituting the KEs for PEs into the middle equation, we get
-0.5kixi - [tex]\mu_{k}[/tex]mgr = -0.5kfxf
xf = (kixi + 2[tex]\mu_{k}[/tex]mgr)/kf
xf is how far the second spring will compress in order to bring the mass to a stop, and is in m, so convert to cm.
 
Hey everyone, I'd thought I'd let everyone know that I did figure this out, our teacher conveniently forgot to teach us the equations for work done by non-conservative forces, so after learning that, it just randomly occurred to me how to solve it.

The short version is this, take PE of the first spring, make that me initial energy in the Work done by non-conservative forces equation (Eo-Wnc=E) and take PE of the second spring and make that the final energy, so basically PE1 - Wnc = Pe2

I explain in more detail here:

PE=1/2kv^2, and Eo-Wnc=E
(Wnc is work of nonconservative forces, Eo is starting energy and E is...final energy)

Because of the law of conservation of energy, I thought I could do this:

PE = E

Or rather, because there are two springs:

PE1 = Eo
E = PE2

So what I did was this:

PE1=1/2k1x2
PE1=1/2(1800)(0.07)2
PE = 4.41J

PE = Eo

Eo-Wnc = E

PE - Wnc = E

PE - (mgμk*d) = E (Because W=Fd and F is = to Nμk (normal force mu k)

4.41 - (0.5*9.8*0.17*1.67) = PE2

3.01889 = PE2

PE = 1/2 kx2

3.01889 = 1/2(500)x2

2(3.01889) = 500x2

0.123088 = x2

X = 0.109888852937866

now because I converted everything to meters and the answer has to be in centimeters, the answer would be 10.9888852937866cm.

And I'm proud to say I figured it all out by myself ^^ hahaha i feel smart now :)THANK YOU EVERY FOR YOUR HELP!

I really appreciate it!Mathieu
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
943
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K