How Does a Vacuum Affect Magnetic Fields?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pete94857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that magnetic fields exist and propagate in a vacuum without any reduction in strength. Contrary to some claims, the presence of air or other materials does not affect the intensity of the magnetic field. The vacuum serves as the reference medium for magnetic fields, and electromagnetic (EM) radiation, which includes oscillating electric and magnetic fields, travels effectively through a vacuum. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding magnetic reluctance and its implications in various mediums.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and their properties
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic (EM) radiation concepts
  • Knowledge of magnetic reluctance and its effects
  • Basic principles of physics related to vacuum environments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of magnetic fields in different mediums
  • Explore the concept of magnetic reluctance in various gases
  • Learn about electromagnetic (EM) radiation propagation in vacuums
  • Investigate the role of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in studying magnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, researchers in electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the behavior of magnetic fields in different environments will benefit from this discussion.

pete94857
Messages
99
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
Magnetic fields in space
Hello,

How does a vacuum effect the distance a d intensity of a magnetic field ?

I've look elsewhere but found conflicting information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you list a couple of your references, and point out how they are in conflict? Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50 and pete94857
I googled the question and various sites came up and I looked at them. I would say they did not seem to be the types of sites to accept knowledge.

Some say the field would not be affected in strength but the distance the field would travel from the source would be reduced meaning the field would be more compressed to the surface.

Other sources claimed no effect at all.

One source claimed it would not be able to exist in a vacuum.

From my own knowledge. I already know the field will exist in a vacuum, I've taken an interest in the LHC etc. I know the what I would call the medium surrounding the source does make a difference, thinking of magnetic reluctance.

But thinking of reluctance I'm unsure about a vacuum because logically there's zero reluctance. So logically to what I understand the field would extend further. But I'm unsure of the intensity through the distance. I.e 1 radius 4 times less etc
 
pete94857 said:
Other sources claimed no effect at all.
That is correct.

pete94857 said:
One source claimed it would not be able to exist in a vacuum.
That is nonsense, so I'd suggest you stay away from that website in the future. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Magnetic fields in vacuum are the reference medium.
The presence of air does not make a difference to the magnetic field.
What other materials are you considering?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pete94857
BTW, remember that light and other Electromagenetic (EM) radiation consists of oscillating electric field and magnetic field waves. They propagate through a vacuum just fine. :wink:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light

1719259717977.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pete94857
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Baluncore said:
Magnetic fields in vacuum are the reference medium.
The presence of air does not make a difference to the magnetic field.
What other materials are you considering?
Various gases. Hydrogen, oxygen I know both react differently with the field.

Thank you, I get it now.
 
OP's question has been answered, so this thread will be tied off now. Thanks
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pete94857

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K