MHB How Does Angular Velocity Affect Crane Boom Dynamics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between angular velocity and crane boom dynamics, particularly in calculating the absolute acceleration of point B on a telescopic crane boom. Key equations are provided to relate tangential and centripetal acceleration to angular variables, emphasizing the importance of angular velocity and its derivatives. A coordinate system is established to simplify calculations, with specific values for angular velocity and acceleration given. The participant shares their approach to calculating velocity and acceleration at point B, suggesting that the problem may be more complex than initially anticipated but can be simplified by treating the crane's base as an inertial reference frame. Overall, the conversation highlights the mathematical principles necessary for understanding crane boom dynamics in relation to angular motion.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
The telescopic boom of a crane rotates with the angular velocity and rotation as indicated about point $A$.
At the same instant, the boom is extending with a constant speed of 0.5ft/s, measured relative to the boom.
Determine the magnitude and acceleration of the absolute acceleration of point $B$ at this instant.
I am not familiar with working with angular velocity.
[URL="http://http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/8895/telescope.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have three equations that are relevant:
\begin{align*}
s &=\theta r\\
v_{\tan} &= \omega r\\
a_{\tan} &= \alpha r.
\end{align*}
Here $s$ is arc length, and $\theta$ is measured in radians. So you can see that the pattern here is "tangential variable is corresponding angular variable times the radius". Now the absolute acceleration of point B is going to be
$$a=\sqrt{a_{\tan}^{2}+a_{c}^{2}},$$
where $a_{\tan}$ is the tangential acceleration, and $a_{c}$ is the centripetal acceleration; the centripetal acceleration is given by
$$a_{c}=\frac{v_{\tan}^{2}}{r}=\omega^{2}\,r.$$

Also note that the angular velocity is a measure of how fast the angle $\theta$ is changing. That is,
$$\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt}.$$
Also,
$$\alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}.$$
These are angular analogues to the linear variable case.

Is that enough to get you started?
 
Ackbach said:
You have three equations that are relevant:
\begin{align*}
s &=\theta r\\
v_{\tan} &= \omega r\\
a_{\tan} &= \alpha r.
\end{align*}
Here $s$ is arc length, and $\theta$ is measured in radians. So you can see that the pattern here is "tangential variable is corresponding angular variable times the radius". Now the absolute acceleration of point B is going to be
$$a=\sqrt{a_{\tan}^{2}+a_{c}^{2}},$$
where $a_{\tan}$ is the tangential acceleration, and $a_{c}$ is the centripetal acceleration; the centripetal acceleration is given by
$$a_{c}=\frac{v_{\tan}^{2}}{r}=\omega^{2}\,r.$$

Also note that the angular velocity is a measure of how fast the angle $\theta$ is changing. That is,
$$\omega=\frac{d\theta}{dt}.$$
Also,
$$\alpha=\frac{d\omega}{dt}.$$
These are angular analogues to the linear variable case.

Is that enough to get you started?
I have done it this way:
Is this correct? How would you do it your way?
Let the $y$ axis be along the line of $AB$, the $z$ axis come out of the page at $A$, and the $x$ axis run perpendicular to $y$ and $z$ from $A$.
That is, $A$ is the origin.
With this coordinate system, $\mathbf{v}_A = \mathbf{a}_A = 0$, $\omega_{AB} = -0.02\mathbf{k}\text{ rad}/\text{s}$, and $\dot{\omega}_{AB} = -0.01\mathbf{k}\text{ rad}/\text{s}^2$.
The position vector for $B$ is $\mathbf{r}_B = 60\mathbf{j}$, the relative velocity at $B$ is $\mathbf{v}_{\text{rel}} = 0.5\mathbf{j}\text{ ft}/\text{s}$, and the relative acceleration is $\mathbf{a}_{\text{rel}} = 0$.
The the velocity and magnitude at $B$ is
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\mathbf{v}_B & = & \mathbf{v}_A + \omega_{AB}\times\mathbf{r}_B + \mathbf{v}_{\text{rel}}\\
& = & 0 + -0.02\mathbf{k}\times 60\mathbf{j} + 0.5\mathbf{j}\\
& = & (1.2\mathbf{i} + 0.5\mathbf{j})\text{ ft}/\text{s}\\
\lVert\mathbf{v}_B\rVert & = & \sqrt{1.2^2 + 0.5^2}\\
& = & 1.3\text{ ft}/\text{s}
\end{alignat*}
The acceleration at $B$ is
\begin{alignat*}{3}
\mathbf{a}_B & = & \mathbf{a}_A + \dot{\omega}_{AB}\times\mathbf{r}_B + \omega_{AB}\times(\omega_{AB}\times\mathbf{r}_B) + 2\omega_{AB}\times\mathbf{v}_{\text{rel}} + \mathbf{a}_{\text{rel}}\\
& = & 0 + -0.01\mathbf{k}\times 60\mathbf{j} + -0.02\mathbf{k}\times(-0.02\mathbf{k}\times 60\mathbf{j}) + -0.04\mathbf{k}\times 0.5\mathbf{j} + 0\\
& = & 0.6\mathbf{i} - 0.024\mathbf{j} + 0.02\mathbf{i}\\
& = & 0.62\mathbf{i} - 0.024\mathbf{j}
\end{alignat*}
 
I think you're making this more complicated than you need - although it is more complicated than I initially thought. You can assume that the base of the crane is an inertial reference frame - hence you do not need the equations for a non-inertial reference frame such as you used. However, you do need to account for the fact that $r$ is changing at a constant speed. You can simply write down $\mathbf{r}$ by using the following:
$$ r(t)=60+0.5t$$
and
$$ \mathbf{r}(t)=r(t) \langle \cos( \theta (t)), \sin( \theta (t)) \rangle.$$
Then simply write it all in and differentiate accordingly. You have
$$ \theta(t)= \theta_{0} +\omega_{0} \,t+ \frac{1}{2} \, \alpha \,t^{2}.$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top