How Does Anhedral Rigging Enhance Sailboat Performance?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ken
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effects of anhedral rigging on sailboat performance, particularly when sailing to windward in moderate to strong winds. Participants explore the relationship between rig heeling, induced drag, and lift, considering both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that heeling the rig to windward may increase speed by altering airflow over the sails, potentially decreasing induced drag and increasing lift.
  • One participant proposes that with windward heel, airflow is directed downward toward the foot of the sail, which may enhance lift due to the wider chord at the bottom.
  • Another participant questions the effectiveness of this approach with different sail shapes, noting that it may not work as well with elliptical sails compared to triangular ones.
  • A participant provides a calculation attempting to quantify the lift generated by heeling, but later acknowledges an error in the calculation that affects the reported velocity increase.
  • There is a discussion about the trade-off between lift and power loss due to the angle of heel, with some suggesting that heeling may reduce drag and drift, contributing to improved performance.
  • One participant mentions the effect of hull shape on performance when heeled, noting that a round hull may align better with leeway flow, potentially reducing drag.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses and calculations regarding the effects of anhedral rigging, but no consensus is reached on the validity of the claims or the calculations presented. Multiple competing views remain regarding the mechanisms at play and their implications for sailboat performance.

Contextual Notes

Some calculations presented are based on assumptions that may not be universally applicable, and the discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and dependencies on specific sail designs and hull shapes.

ken
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi,

There is some evidence that on a silboat going to windward in moderate to strong wind, heeling the rig over to windward (the reverse of normal) gives significantly increased speed. It works on narrow hull boats but only on wide hulls where the rig is heeled independantly of the hull.

The question is why?

This is like an anhedral wing. Does anhedral decrease induced drag?

Does anhedral increase lift?

Where can I find information on this?


Ken
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My guess would be that with windward heel, air flows at an angle down toward the water, while with leeward heel, wind flows up toward the top. Since the sail is wider near the bottom, it would be better for more wind to flow over the bottom.
 
russ_watters said:
My guess would be that with windward heel, air flows at an angle down toward the water, while with leeward heel, wind flows up toward the top. Since the sail is wider near the bottom, it would be better for more wind to flow over the bottom.

Hi Russ, nice to hear from you again.

That's a good thought.
I haven't experienced this myself but the claim is for as much as 10% increase. If your guess is correct, It will not work so well with eliptical sail plans as with triangular sails. Also should not work above the design wind as the boat is already at maximun power.

Are you aware of any significant effects on induced drag with changes in dihedral or anhedral, up top +-10 deg?

Ken
 
russ_watters said:
My guess would be that with windward heel, air flows at an angle down toward the water, while with leeward heel, wind flows up toward the top. Since the sail is wider near the bottom, it would be better for more wind to flow over the bottom.
I don't understand your last sentence.
I think heeling to wind'd means the sail in giving some lift, which is like
lightening the boat. Also sailboats are usually designed to sail faster when heeled, because the WL length is increased.
 
Hi

I believe Russ is talking about the way cross flows change with heel.
When heeled to lee, there is an upward component of cross flow toward the peak of the sail there the chord is generally narrower. When heeled to windward, the flow is directed more downward toward the foot or boom. Now as all sailboats operate within the winds boundary layer, there is a velocity gradient with height so Russ is suggesting the whole veolcity gradient is moved downwards where the sail has more chord and therefore generates higher load.

Lets say my 14 foot boat. Total sailing weight = 250 kg including 2 crew
Sail area = 9.3 m^2
Max sail reaction upwind = 900 N

heeld 5 deg to windward, lift = sin (5) * 900 = 78 N = 8 kg

Boat now 96.8% of original weight.
By cubes and squares, that's 96% wetted or even Xsection area.
Take the inverse square for the new velocity 1.09 %

OK, that's very interesting confirming the lift theory.
I'd not have thought it that much. Is the calculation valid?

Ken
 
I made a mistake, I squared the inverse change in area/drag, should have taken the square root. Velocity increase would then be 1.014% which is not enough to account for the reported speed increase.

Ken
 
By the way, if there is a lift (accounted by sin(5)), then you loose part of the power (cos(5)), that would decrease the increment provided by the lift.
Now, if one thinks that the power of the sail is not fully oriented to the heading of the hull (ie, ther is a drift component), most of the lift would come from the perpendicular, undesired component of the force: then drift. Then, by heeling, the boat experiments a reduced drag due to the lift but also reduce drift. Might this account for the increased performance?
 
Agreed there is technically reduced power in the horizontal plan proportional to cos 5 but that's pretty insignificant.

Someone also pointed out that when a round hull with transom (most planing dinghies) is heeled to windward, the aft contact point with the water moves to windward. This has the effect or rotating the wetted hull to align with the leeway flow. Much the same effect as a gybing board. Don't know if this could reduce the drag much.

Maybe it's a combination of several effects.

Ken
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K