How Does Changing Spring Constants Affect Mass Oscillation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wripples
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the dynamics of a mass M connected to two springs with differing spring constants, specifically when the right spring's constant changes from k to 3k. The initial conditions are set with M at position x(0) = 0 and an assumption of zero initial velocity, v(0) = 0. The net force is derived from the restoring forces of both springs, leading to the equation ma = 2kL - 4kx, which presents a complex differential equation. The solution involves calculating the new equilibrium position and determining the motion around it, including amplitude and frequency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and spring constants
  • Familiarity with differential equations and their solutions
  • Knowledge of oscillatory motion and its parameters (amplitude, frequency)
  • Basic principles of classical mechanics, particularly Newton's laws
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and solution of second-order differential equations
  • Learn about oscillations in mechanical systems, focusing on coupled oscillators
  • Explore the concept of equilibrium positions in spring-mass systems
  • Investigate the effects of varying spring constants on system dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying mechanics and oscillatory systems, as well as educators and anyone interested in the mathematical modeling of physical systems involving springs and mass.

wripples
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So the problem is that you have a mass m connected to two springs, where each of the two springs is connected to a wall, as such:

|--------M--------|

Each spring first has a spring constant k and a equilibrium length L, and then when set up in the above configuration, M is 2L away from both walls (so both springs are stretched a length L from their equilibrium). Then the spring on the right has its spring constant instantaneously changed to 3k (instead of k), and the goal is to find the resulting function to describe the motion of M. We are to take its initial position to be 0 (so x(0) = 0).

2. The attempt at a solution

So my approach is to first set up the problem. First, take positive x to be displacement to the right. We have x(0) = 0, and since the right spring constant is supposed to instantaneously change to 3k, I assumed v(0) = 0. On the other hand, I'm not entirely sure that is right; perhaps I should solve for the acceleration at time t = 0 using the fact that both springs are stretched L past their equilibrium?

Afterwards, I try to find the net force. On the left, the spring with spring constant k has restoring force F_1 = -k(L+x), since it is already displaced by L to begin with, so it should already be acting with a force of -kL when we are at time t = 0, and stretching to the right (positive x) should increase the restoring force. Similarly, the force of the spring on the right is F_2 = -3k(-L+x); at the start, it should already have a force of magnitude 3kL pointing to the right, so it makes sense for x = 0, and as x increases (moves right), its restoring force should decrease.

Now, equating with F_2 - F_1 = F_net = ma, we have ma = 2kL - 4kx, which seems like its a particularly nasty differential equation to solve, due to the inhomogeneous term 2kL. Perhaps this is correct? And if so, how does one such solve a differential equation? I'm particularly rusty on doing that type of stuff.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest to calculate everything relative to the new equilibrium position.
You can find this position follows from F=0 (or a=0)
Then you know the solution for motion around the equilibrium. The initial position is L/2 from equilibrium (if your formula for acceleration is right) so the amplitude will be L/2. Find the frequency from the new net force. Use initial conditions to find initial phase.
Then you can add L/2 in order to shift back the origin in the middle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K