How Does Changing the Work Function Affect Photoelectron Emission?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the photoelectric effect, specifically examining how changes in the work function of a metal surface affect the emission of photoelectrons when illuminated by ultraviolet light. The original poster presents a series of calculations related to the maximum speed of ejected electrons, stopping potential, and the implications of altering the work function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute the wavelength of incident photons and the stopping potential based on given values. They also express uncertainty about their calculations and seek clarification on the implications of changing the work function. Other participants question the accuracy of the frequency calculation and suggest that the results seem inconsistent with expected physical behavior.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations and encouraging them to revisit certain aspects of their approach. There is a focus on ensuring that the calculations align with known physical principles, particularly regarding the expected frequency range for photoelectric emission.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates that the question is part of an exam, which may impose constraints on the information they can provide. There is also a mention of specific homework rules regarding posting attempts, which may affect the flow of the discussion.

meltem
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Modern Physics, homework, please help:(

A metal surface with a work function of (W1=3eV) is illuminated with a monochromatic ultraviolet light of frequency v*1. The maximum speed of the ejected photo electrons was found to be v1=0.6x10^6m/s.

a) compute the wavelength λ of the incident photons.
b) what is the stopping potential?
c) now the metal is in the photo tube is changed so the work function is W2=5.5eV. Everything else remains the same. Compute the maxiumum speed of the ejected photo electrons and discuss.
d) How would the magnitude of the photo current be changed if the intensity of the incident light were increased? Increases, decreases or does not change? ( answer these question for parts (a) and (c)).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You need to post your attempt. What would your relevant equations be?
 


rock.freak667 said:
You need to post your attempt. What would your relevant equations be?

sorry, i didnt know this rule.. actually i knew formulas but i don't know where i should use them. Also this question is from my exam. I couldn't do it there:s

a ) A metal surface with work function φ = 3.0 eV
maximum speed ejected from photo electrons is v_1 = 0.6 *10^6 m/s

K.E _max = h f - φ
1/2 mv^2 = hf - φ
1/2 * 9.1 *10^-31 kg ( 0.6 *10^6 m/s)^2 = 6.625*10^-34 J.s * f - 3.0 * 1.6 *10^-19 J /eV
f = 9.71*10^-5 Hz
wavelength λ = c
= 3 *10^8 m/s / 9.71*10^-5 Hz
= 3.08*10^12 m

b ) stopping potential is K.E = q ΔV
1/2 * 9.1 *10^-31 kg ( 0.6 *10^6 m/s)^2 = 1.6 *10^-19 C * ΔV
ΔV = 1.02V

c) same formula with a
d) i don't know:s

am I right?
 
Last edited:


You might want to revisit your frequency calculation. The method and numbers used look okay, but your result seems to be out of whack; your value implies a period for the wave of nearly three hours!

For photoelectric emission on metals you'd expect the light to be in the hundreds of terahertz range.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K