How Does Current Direction and Charge Flow in a Solenoid-Wire System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eitan Levy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solenoid Wire
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of current and charge flow in a solenoid-wire system when connected to a voltage source. The solenoid has a radius of 0.05m, 800 loops per meter, and a resistance of 0.2Ω, with an electromotive force (ε) of 120V. The magnetic field inside the solenoid points to the right, causing the current in the wire to flow from point A to B. The total charge flowing through the resistor can be determined using the equation ΔQ = NΔ∅/R, where N is the number of loops, Δ∅ is the change in magnetic flux, and R is the resistance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic induction principles
  • Familiarity with Faraday's law of induction
  • Knowledge of solenoid characteristics and magnetic fields
  • Basic circuit analysis, including Ohm's law (ε = IR)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Faraday's law of induction in various scenarios
  • Learn about the behavior of magnetic fields in solenoids
  • Explore the relationship between magnetic flux and induced electromotive force
  • Investigate the effects of resistance in series and parallel circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding electromagnetic principles and circuit behavior in solenoid systems.

Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


[/B]
A solenoid is not connected to an ideal voltage source.
Its radius is 0.05m, it has 800 loops per meter and its resistance is 0.2Ω. ε=120V.
Around the solenoid we bind two loops of a wire. The loops are attached to a resistor with the resistance of 0.8Ω.
Suddenly, we connect the voltage source.
What is the direction of the current in the wire?
What is the total amount of charge that flows through the resistor?

Homework Equations


B=μ0nI.
ε=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I succesfully calculated that the change in the flux would be -9.47*10-3Wb.
Regarding the first question, I thought that inside the solenoid a magnetic field is created pointing to the right (but I am really not sure about it). So the wire will have to create a magnetic flux pointing to the left, and that in order to do so the current will have to flow from A to B.
Regarding the second question, I simply don't understand how can we know when current will not flow anymore in the wire? When does it stop and why?
 

Attachments

  • 20180226_180839.jpg
    20180226_180839.jpg
    32 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
Eitan Levy said:
Regarding the first question, I thought that inside the solenoid a magnetic field is created pointing to the right (but I am really not sure about it).
Yes. If you want to check your understanding of this, please explain how you deduced the direction of the field of the solenoid.

So the wire will have to create a magnetic flux pointing to the left, and that in order to do so the current will have to flow from A to B.
Yes.
Regarding the second question, I simply don't understand how can we know when current will not flow anymore in the wire? When does it stop and why?
It is interesting that you don't need to know the details of how the current changes with time. Hint: Integrate Faraday's law of induction.
 
TSny said:
Yes. If you want to check your understanding of this, please explain how you deduced the direction of the field of the solenoid.

Yes.
It is interesting that you don't need to know the details of how the current changes with time. Hint: Integrate Faraday's law of induction.

I reached this conclusion by rotating the solenoid by 90 degrees and then using the second right hand rule, definitely not the most simple way.
Okay, so I had this idea:
ε=N*Δ∅/Δt
ΔQ/Δt*R=N*Δ∅/Δt
ΔQ=N*Δ∅/R.
I thought that because we have 2 loops I need to multiply by N (by 2). However according to the book it's wrong (The correct answer is when you don't multiply by N), why?
Perhaps it's because I already multiplied by 2 when I calculated the flux?
 
Did you already multiply by 2 in finding the value of the change in flux that you stated in your first post?
 
TSny said:
Did you already multiply by 2 in finding the value of the change in flux that you stated in your first post?
Yes, I figured that was the problem.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K