ajaysabarish
- 58
- 0
i have studied that a conductor is equipotential and charges don't flow through it but how does it flow through a wire?
The discussion centers around the behavior of current in conductors, particularly in the context of equipotential conductors and the conditions under which charges flow. Participants explore concepts related to electrostatics, potential difference, and Kirchhoff's laws, examining how these principles apply to real-world scenarios.
Participants express differing views on the implications of equipotentiality for current flow, with no consensus reached on how Kirchhoff's laws apply in this context. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of potential difference in relation to current flow in conductors.
Limitations include varying interpretations of electrostatic conditions, the role of potential difference, and the representation of resistance in circuit analysis. These factors contribute to the complexity of the discussion without definitive resolutions.
ajaysabarish said:i have studied that a conductor is equipotential and charges don't flow through it but how does it flow through a wire?
I think you may be talking about a conductor in electrostatics.ajaysabarish said:and charges don't flow through it
but potential difference across a wire(conductor) is taken as zero while writing kirchhoffs law?so there is no potential difference hence charges shouldn't flow through itZapperZ said:It is because there is an external "source" that keeps one end of it at one potential, and the other end at another potential.
Note that the conductor does not have zero resistance for this to occur.
Zz
but potential difference across a wire(conductor) is taken as zero while writing kirchhoffs law?so there is no potential difference hence charges shouldn't flow through itPrannu said:Also note that if the conductor is in electrostatic equilibrium, then there is no (net) electric field on the charged particles inside (hence a constant electric potential). This means that if the conductor is not in electrostatic equilibrium, then there is a (net) electric field on the charged particles inside, and thus, a potential difference, which causes current.
iam talking about both,just comparing them.Dale said:I think you may be talking about a conductor in electrostatics.
ajaysabarish said:but potential difference across a wire(conductor) is taken as zero while writing kirchhoffs law?so there is no potential difference hence charges shouldn't flow through it
yes,so shouldn't it have a resistance,but why don't we take it during kirchhoffs lawZapperZ said:Try doing Kirchoff law on such a circuit, i.e. with a zero-resistance conductor connecting the ends of a battery. You will have a SHORT!
Zz.
ajaysabarish said:yes,so shouldn't it have a resistance,but why don't we take it during kirchhoffs law