How Does Heat Flow Direction Relate to the Second Law of Thermodynamics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that heat flows from a high temperature area to a low temperature area, in accordance with the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The scenario involves a one-dimensional conductor with temperature maintained at T_0 and T_L, where q_0 represents the heat entering through the x=0 cross-section. The conclusion drawn is that for the entropy change (dS/dt) to be non-negative, T_0 must be greater than T_L, thereby confirming the direction of heat flow aligns with the Second Law.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
  • Familiarity with heat transfer concepts
  • Knowledge of entropy and its implications in thermodynamic processes
  • Basic principles of one-dimensional conduction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical formulation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics
  • Learn about heat conduction in one-dimensional systems
  • Explore entropy calculations in thermodynamic processes
  • Investigate real-world applications of heat transfer principles
USEFUL FOR

Students studying thermodynamics, physicists, and engineers interested in heat transfer and entropy principles.

MJCfromCT
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
"Proof" of heat flow direction?

Hi everyone, I have a homework problem that basically says to prove that heat is conducted from a high temperature area to a low temperature area:

Homework Statement



Consider a one-dimensional conductor, stretching from x=0 to x=L. The two ends are maintained at T_0 and T_L. The four sides of the conductor are insulated. The temperature distribution along the conductor is steady.

q_0 represents the heat that enters through the x=0 cross section. Assume q_0 is position, so heat is conducted in the positive x-direction.

Invoke the 2nd law to prove that q_0 flows toward lower temperatures, for example, by showing that T_L cannot be greater than T_0

Homework Equations



2nd Law of thermodynamics


The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt is as follows:

I have the 2nd Law in the following form:

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/9004/problem11qw8.jpg

I have come across this equation in my text (Heat Transfer, Bejan, 1993) as well:

http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/6189/problem12ks5.jpg

I wish to substitute this equation into the "q" part of the 2nd Law. From here, in order for the "dS/dt" term to be greater than or equal to zero (Entropy always increasing), the T_0 - T_L term must be greater than zero, therefore, T_0 must be greater than T_L.

Does this make sense? I'm not sure what to do about the summation term in the form of the 2nd law that I have. Do I only pick the "0" position and forget about the "L" position?

Thanks in advance for your help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question got me curious, so I pulled out my old statistical physics text (berkeley physics course-volume 5 by F. Reif). Heres a couple of quotes that may help?
In an infinitesimal quasi-static process in which the system absorbs heat dQ, its entropy changes by an amount
dS=dQ/T
where T is ...called its absolute temperature.

In any process in which a thermally isolated system changes from on macrostate to another, its entropy tends to increase, i.e.,
deltaS>=0
...is significant because it specifies the direction in which nonequilibrium situations tend to proceed.
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the reply. I agree with the quotes you have listed, but I am unsure as to how they help. I agree that they discuss the means by which entropy increases, but I am unsure as to how the increase in entropy relates to the diffusion of heat from a high temperature area to a low temperature area.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K