How Does Human Power Relate to Acceleration in Lifting 40kg Up 36m?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phadgebar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done in lifting a 40kg weight to a height of 36 meters, which results in 14,400 joules of work. It emphasizes the importance of including gravitational acceleration, approximately 10m/s², to convert mass into force. The distinction between mass and force is clarified, highlighting that mass alone does not account for the force exerted without considering gravity. The formula for force, f=ma, is referenced to illustrate this relationship. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately calculating work in lifting scenarios.
Phadgebar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
about human power??

consider the worker needs to bring up 40kg, the floor is about 36m so the work done is
w = (40kg) (10m/s^2) (36m)
w = 14 400J

i don't know what's the (10m/s^2) for??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Work is force times distance. If you only use 40kg x 36m, you're multiplying mass times distance.

Mass and force are two different concepts. You need gravity in order for mass to have a force. In order to figure out how much force that mass is applying, you need to multiply it by the acceleration due gravity, which in any case on the planet Earth is close to 10m/s^2...although closer to 9.81, which is what we typically use.
 
Last edited:


f=ma
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top