How Does Inorganic Chemistry Explain Chemical Phenomena?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ashu2912
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemistry Works
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of theories in inorganic chemistry, specifically regarding their purpose in explaining chemical phenomena such as bonding and the creation of new compounds. Participants agree that while theories are primarily formulated to explain known phenomena, they also have the potential to predict new compounds based on thermodynamic and energetic feasibility. The conversation emphasizes the importance of asking "Why does this happen?" rather than solely focusing on existing occurrences in nature. The activity series is cited as a successful theory that explains differing behaviors of elements like sodium and gold in water.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic inorganic chemistry concepts
  • Familiarity with thermodynamics and energetics in chemical reactions
  • Knowledge of chemical bonding theories
  • Awareness of the activity series in predicting element behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of thermodynamics in chemical reactions
  • Explore advanced theories of chemical bonding
  • Study the activity series and its applications in predicting chemical behavior
  • Investigate the process of synthesizing new compounds based on existing theories
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and researchers interested in the theoretical foundations of inorganic chemistry and the predictive capabilities of chemical theories.

Ashu2912
Messages
106
Reaction score
1
How Chemistry Works?

Hey friends, I was just giving it a thought about how the science of (inorganic) chemistry works. Are all the theories formulated just in order to explain the chemical phenomena, such as bonding? Do these theories hold place for creation of new compounds based on the possible permutations satisfying the theory (that is if they are feasible thermodynamically, energetically and so on...). Or we only build theories to account for what already occurs in nature? Pls. give your opinions. Thank You!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org


Usual way is to build a theory explaining known phenomena and then check if it can be used to predict something new. That's not just in inorganic chemistry, that's how the science works.
 


You mean to say, we should ask "Why this happens" and not "why this does not happen". Not to synthesize something new based on the theory?
 


Ashu2912 said:
Hey friends, I was just giving it a thought about how the science of (inorganic) chemistry works. Are all the theories formulated just in order to explain the chemical phenomena, such as bonding? Do these theories hold place for creation of new compounds based on the possible permutations satisfying the theory (that is if they are feasible thermodynamically, energetically and so on...). Or we only build theories to account for what already occurs in nature? Pls. give your opinions. Thank You!
Then question seems unclear. I wonder if I understand because it seems like the last question might be the same as the first.
It would probably be wrong to say all the theories are intended to explain phenomena.
I would say that some of the theories do suggest that new compounds of the same elements can be created.
It would probably be wrong to say that we ONLY build theories to account for naturally occurring phenomena.
 


Ashu2912 said:
You mean to say, we should ask "Why this happens" and not "why this does not happen". Not to synthesize something new based on the theory?

"It doesn't happen" is a phenomena just like "it happens".

I have a piece of sodium metal that fizzles when put in water, I have a piece of gold that doesn't change when put in water. Good theory should be able to explain both cases. And such theory exists and explains both cases in terms of activity series.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K